Teams

LTA YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-29vs BTA REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Karen Dauer vs Samantha McBride / Polly Rothberg1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Zempel / Linda Ducay vs Debby Bell / Susan Olenwine6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori Preston / TOMOKO WATANABE vs Paula King / Amy Dodd6-2, 6-2
2022-06-22vs MEA REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Linda Ducay vs Leslie Allen / Martha Lanaghen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTricia Marsh / Laura Zempel vs Victoria Koury / Teri Jean Fry1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Dauer / Alicia Hillen vs Diane Bohan / Patsy James6-4, 6-4
2022-06-15vs NJ TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Obrien / Linda Ducay vs Helen Hock / Susan Lenny7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-06-14vs CVTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinda Ducay / Julie Obrien vs Cheri Belz / Ruth Weinberg6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Dauer / Alicia Hillen vs Ann Larson / Linda Levy3-6, 6-7
2022-06-08vs BRMST NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Julie Obrien vs Kathy Depinto / Jill Bouck2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Dauer / Alicia Hillen vs Vickie Garn / Carol Anderson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Zempel / Tricia Marsh vs Ann Ipsen / Michele Martin6-1, 6-3
2022-05-25vs BTA REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Ducay / Stephanie Ohlsen vs Samantha McBride / Paula King3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Zempel / Tricia Marsh vs Amy Dodd / Peggy Phillips6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTOMOKO WATANABE / Karen Dauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-18vs MEA REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Ducay / Julie Obrien vs Julie von Eschen / Catherine Faughnan6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTricia Marsh / Laura Zempel vs Martha Lanaghen / Victoria Koury6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Dauer / TOMOKO WATANABE vs Shawna Sharp / Teri Jean Fry2-6, 3-6
2022-05-17vs BRMST NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Julie Obrien vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Jill Bouck6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTricia Marsh / Laura Zempel vs Carol Anderson / Kimberley Paulsen5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Ducay / Karen Dauer vs Kathy Depinto / Vickie Garn2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-11vs NJ TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Ohlsen / Julie Obrien vs Angela Harper / Helen Hock6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Ducay / Tricia Marsh vs Mary Mittag-Miller / Elizabeth Shields6-1, 6-1
2022-04-27vs CVTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Ducay / Stephanie Ohlsen vs Claudia Deere / Kris Graham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Dauer / Julie Obrien vs Jackie Johnson / Ann Larson7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Stephanie Ohlsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Lori Preston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Karen Dauer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.04
Linda Ducay
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.94
Alicia Hillen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Julie Obrien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Zempel
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
TOMOKO WATANABE
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tricia Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Zempel + Tricia Marsh15761% games+7.8% vs expected
Karen Dauer + Stephanie Ohlsen13655% games−0.9% vs expected
Julie Obrien + Lori Preston3445% games−1.0% vs expected
Linda Ducay + Stephanie Ohlsen81149% games−2.6% vs expected
Karen Dauer + Alicia Hillen2741% games−9.2% vs expected
Karen Dauer + Linda Ducay4646% games−13.5% vs expected
Karen Dauer + Tricia Marsh4160% gamesnot enough data
Alicia Hillen + Linda Ducay224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stephanie Ohlsen
134W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Lori Preston
121W–71L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Karen Dauer
80W–57L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Linda Ducay
119W–124L career · 9 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Alicia Hillen
39W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Julie Obrien
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Zempel
30W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
TOMOKO WATANABE
20W–10L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia Marsh
37W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.