Teams

GSTL40/Hale/Prestwick

2025 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult MEN - 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult MEN - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Anthony Carmola
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Bruno Castaneda
published 4
3.87
William Potter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Dan Muntean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Cheevin Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Robert Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Jim Quinney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Joe Leo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Matthew Hale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Jon VanScoyoc
published
3.21
Derek Harris
published 3.5
3.08
Paul Doyle
published
3.07
Terry Walden
published
James Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Catoe
published
Marc Krein
published
Robert OBrien
published
Sandy Hendrick
published
Stephen Silbiger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Leo + Jim Quinney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anthony Carmola
19W–9L career · type D · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4
Bruno Castaneda
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
William Potter
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Dan Muntean
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Cheevin Gardner
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Robert Purvis
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jim Quinney
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Joe Leo
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Matthew Hale
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Jon VanScoyoc
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Derek Harris
49W–27L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Paul Doyle
4W–21L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Terry Walden
27W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
James Hubbard
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Catoe
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marc Krein
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert OBrien
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Hendrick
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Silbiger
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.