Teams

HANSEN 8.0 SUMMER 18's

2022 MIXED 18 & OVER SUMMER · 8.0 MIXED

15 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-17vs Ewen- 2022SLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeci Bjornson / Alejandro Trevino vs Melonie Sebring / Brendan FitzPatrick0-6, 2-6
2022-06-19vs Ormsbee - summerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Hansen / Alejandro Trevino vs Gian Franco Valenzuela / Emma Wu6-4, 6-2
2022-06-12vs Reiling-Stout Summer MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeci Bjornson / Alejandro Trevino vs Hillary Kiefer / KJ Lynch6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs ShemyakinKarpovSummerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Hansen / Alejandro Trevino vs Alyssa Vanderschaaf / Timothy Smith7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs Proepper- South Metro MixLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Beci Bjornson vs Cecilia Grass-Neary / Jo Janssens1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Brandon Vaughn
published 4.5
Amy Lamparske
published 4.5
4.16
Beci Bjornson
published 4.5
4.14
Dana Hansen
published 4.5
3.98
Noelle Dougan
published
3.84
Lisa Ogren
published
3.82
Virginia Kuberski
published
3.81
Benjamin Colburn
published 4
3.25
Craig Kuberski
published 3.5
3.18
Alejandro Trevino
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Joseph Early
published
Josh Bliss
published
Nicholas Fisher
published
Roshan Rajkumar
published
Tia Fjelstad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ogren + Benjamin Colburn224 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Kuberski + Craig Kuberski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brandon Vaughn
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Amy Lamparske
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Beci Bjornson
17W–21L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Dana Hansen
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Noelle Dougan
25W–45L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Lisa Ogren
22W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
Virginia Kuberski
68W–44L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Benjamin Colburn
41W–63L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Craig Kuberski
20W–28L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Joseph Early
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Josh Bliss
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicholas Fisher
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roshan Rajkumar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tia Fjelstad
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.