Teams

LCTA18/JUMANI/LTP-DI

18 & Over · 18 & Over LLAS - Men 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-15vs LCTA18/Zeif/Danny JonesLost 12
L#1 DoublesLance Fletcher / Christopher Allen vs Jason Baughman / Cameron Spell2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesNicholas Taylor vs Rob Dauch6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGeorge Evanko / Ikbal Jumani vs Bobby Mathes / Slava Zeif0-6, 1-6
2025-06-14vs LCTA18/Zeif/Danny JonesLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicholas Taylor / Lance Fletcher vs Cameron Spell / Rudy Romano4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Allen vs Jason Baughman2-6, 0-6
2025-06-14vs LCTA18/Zeif/Danny JonesLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Allen / George Evanko vs Jason Baughman / Rob Dauch1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNicholas Taylor vs Bobby Mathes6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLance Fletcher / Ikbal Jumani vs Rudy Romano / Cameron Spell3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over LLAS - Men 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Nicholas Taylor
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
James Vaughn
published 3
2.45
Christopher Allen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.39
Juan Barragan
published
2.32
Lance Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ikbal Jumani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.86
George Evanko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jason Bernd
published
Mason Park
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Vaughn + Christopher Allen314 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Allen + Nicholas Taylor404 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Taylor + Juan Barragan314 matchesnot enough data
Ikbal Jumani + George Evanko033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Taylor
70W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
James Vaughn
22W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christopher Allen
32W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.45
Juan Barragan
12W–24L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.39
Lance Fletcher
4W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.32
2.5
Ikbal Jumani
10W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
George Evanko
10W–42L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Jason Bernd
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mason Park
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.