Teams

3 ACAC Naputi

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-10vs 7 Westwood WestWon 21
L#1 SinglesPeter Olson vs Bailey White2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesThomas Tirrell vs Brian Kinnear6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Zakk Lefkowits4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-19vs 1 Powhatan 3.0 Tennisbums - KelleyLost 03
L#1 SinglesPeter Olson vs Long Duong4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGreg Jabs vs Benjamin Pham4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Allen Sleeman1-6, 2-6
2025-10-08vs 10 WOCC Mullinax 3.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Rose vs Price Enroughty3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBradford Rhodes vs Ivan Mullinax3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Patrick McDuff6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-01vs 8 MAC We R Them - PessarraLost 03
L#1 SinglesThomas Tirrell vs Kyle Bagley1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Peskind vs Michael Bowman3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesDavid Naputi vs Jay Pettit1-6, 1-6
2025-09-24vs 5 LPC MorganWon 21
L#1 SinglesScott Rose vs Nicholas Arcaro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobert Peskind vs Robert Meister6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBradford Rhodes vs Douglas Morgan6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Scott Rose
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.99
Thomas Tirrell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.80
Peter Olson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.76
Greg Jabs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.68
Robert Peskind
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.63
Bradford Rhodes
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
David Naputi
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Naputi + Bradford Rhodes314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Rose
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Thomas Tirrell
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Peter Olson
24W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Greg Jabs
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Robert Peskind
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Bradford Rhodes
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
David Naputi
28W–25L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.