Teams

Hills/Palmer/18&Over3.5M

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesGvozden Dokic / Jack Korta vs Joel Sparr / Louis Hanna6-0, 6-4
2024-03-09vs Apollo Beach - C. PearsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGvozden Dokic / Max Collazo vs Wade Morris / Richard Marchman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMax Collazo / Rogerio Buchner de Freitas vs Ken Patrick / Somil Kadakia6-4, 6-1
2024-02-24vs Pirates of HCC - F. RussianLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarl-Edris Dessieu / Gvozden Dokic vs Franck Bauguil / Eric Beare2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKen Chin / Max Collazo vs Bill McLendon / Pedro Zambrano2-6, 1-6
2024-02-13vs Hills/Cantu/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesKarl-Edris Dessieu / Jack Korta vs Patrick Duroseau / Scott Tashman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-10vs TYCC Yacht Rock - B. RockwoodWon 10
W#3 DoublesMax Collazo / Ken Chin vs Michael Mariani / Charles Mulfinger6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-13vs Pirates of HCC - F. RussianLost 01
L#2 DoublesKarl-Edris Dessieu / Derek DeBrocke vs Michael Harden / Benjamin Bee6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Gregory Hovsepian
published
3.61
Karl-Edris Dessieu
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.58
Derek DeBrocke
published 4
3.45
Michael Gauthier
published
3.43
Ken Chin
published
3.40
Max Collazo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Palmer
published
3.31
Jack Korta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Gvozden Dokic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Chin + Max Collazo404 matchesnot enough data
Ken Chin + Jack Korta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gregory Hovsepian
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Arun Arockia Charles Vanathuchinnappan
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Karl-Edris Dessieu
76W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Derek DeBrocke
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
Rogerio Buchner de Freitas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Michael Gauthier
22W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Max Collazo
66W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Michael Palmer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Jack Korta
65W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Gvozden Dokic
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.