Teams

Apollo Beach - J. Feeney

2026 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Donna Whiting vs Sherry Peterson / Theresa Mays6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCissy Barr / Kathleen Gafarian vs Tina Sturdevant / Karen Cleland6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Feeney / Ginger Marchiniak vs Carmen Heggen / Cille Williams2-6, 1-6
2026-03-07vs Plant City 55+ - P. SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Donna Whiting vs Kandy Wood / Debra Summers6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCissy Barr / Amalia Alaniz vs Julie Goodwin / Jackie Wyckoff4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJane Feeney / Lynn Malarz vs Patricia Smith / Rosa Jean6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Kathleen Gafarian vs Colleen Lenaghan / Lisa Marinez3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Whiting / Lynn Malarz vs Karan Orbegoso / Sonia Cecilia Slaven3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGinger Marchiniak / Cissy Barr vs Kathleen Daciek / Anne McKenna6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDonna Whiting / Kathleen Gafarian vs Margaret Filbert / Sherry Peterson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Ginger Marchiniak vs Theresa Mays / Karen Cachion1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Feeney / Amalia Alaniz vs Cille Williams / Carol Guidera4-6, 1-6
2026-02-14vs Plant City 55+ - P. SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Lynn Malarz vs Catherine Mueller / Kandy Wood6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAmalia Alaniz / Donna Whiting vs Jackie Wyckoff / Rosa Jean4-3
W#3 DoublesGinger Marchiniak / Nancy Matuszak vs Patricia Smith / Susan Rind6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Mary Raymond vs Elizabeth DeConti / Colleen Lenaghan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmalia Alaniz / Kathleen Gafarian vs Deborah Brown / Marieglory Quinones6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCissy Barr / Jane Feeney vs Anne McKenna / Sonia Cecilia Slaven5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Donna Whiting vs Theresa Mays / Karen Cleland6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Matuszak / Lynn Malarz vs Cindy Arment / Tricia Cardoso1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Dolan / Mary Raymond vs Hannah Gabora / Cille Williams2-6, 2-6
2026-01-24vs Plant City 55+ - P. SmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Dolan / Mary Raymond vs Susan MOSHER / Angie Mudge2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJane Feeney / Karen Montembeault vs Catherine Mueller / Karen Hogg4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmalia Alaniz / Cissy Barr vs Rachel Ray / Dorothy Flair0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKathleen Gafarian / Donna Whiting vs Lisa Marinez / Deborah Brown6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Raymond / Barbara Dolan vs Pat Morris / Anne McKenna6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Cissy Barr vs Cindy Sparks / Kathleen Daciek6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Kathleen Gafarian
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.59
Cissy Barr
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Amalia Alaniz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.32
Barbara Dolan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Donna Whiting
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Ginger Marchiniak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jane Feeney
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Karen Montembeault
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lynn Malarz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Matuszak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Whiting + Karen Montembeault5165% gamesnot enough data
Jane Feeney + Amalia Alaniz1440% gamesnot enough data
Donna Whiting + Amalia Alaniz134 matchesnot enough data
Cissy Barr + Ginger Marchiniak314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Raymond + Karen Montembeault314 matchesnot enough data
Donna Whiting + Kathleen Gafarian213 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Dolan + Mary Raymond123 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Matuszak + Lynn Malarz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Gafarian
12W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cissy Barr
7W–6L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Amalia Alaniz
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Barbara Dolan
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32
Donna Whiting
18W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ginger Marchiniak
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jane Feeney
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Montembeault
9W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Malarz
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Raymond
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Matuszak
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.