Teams

3-JHull-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-17vs 1-RMcClenny-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesEthan Botts / Parker Sheridan vs Richard McClenny / Jason Abhau5-7, 4-6
2023-10-11vs 2-JByrd-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesConnor Cooke / Parker Sheridan vs Tom Letecheur / James Rees2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJordan Krasner / Ryan Sayko vs Jermaine Byrd / Krisztian Toth1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-09-19vs 2-JByrd-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Sayko / Jordan Krasner vs Jermaine Byrd / James Rees6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-05vs 2-JByrd-EnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesParker Sheridan / Richard Papantonis vs William Heim / Herman Naftel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRyan Sayko / Alex Renfrow vs Peter Hull / Julien de la Mettrie0-6, 0-6
2023-09-05vs 1-RMcClenny-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Krasner / Ryan Sayko vs Justin Panepinto / Connor Wilkins4-6, 3-6
2023-08-31Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAlex Renfrow / Ryan Sayko vs Gabriel Cucalon / Brandon Keisner0-6, 1-6
2023-08-17vs 1-RMcClenny-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesParker Sheridan / Richard Papantonis vs Ravi Tewari / Simon Cagle5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Arvind Nagarajan
published 5
4.47
Jason Hull
published
4.43
Parker Sheridan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.25
Alex Renfrow
published 4.5
4.14
Ryan Sayko
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.06
Ethan Botts
published 4.5
Ben Richards
published
Joseph Monaldo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Arvind Nagarajan
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Hull
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
4.47
4.5
Parker Sheridan
202W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Alex Renfrow
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Ryan Sayko
78W–106L career · 8 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Ethan Botts
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.06
Ben Richards
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Monaldo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.