Teams

HMahgoub (PCC)

2025 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-28vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Michael vs Sarat Mishra2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTim Rodriguez vs Darden Blow2-6, 1-6
2025-07-14vs VDatta (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 SinglesDavid Michael vs Andy Love6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlexander Killeffer vs Vikram Datta6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHani Mahgoub vs Philip Solomon7-5, 6-1
2025-07-07vs BStover/LEvansek (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesRaul Zamudio vs Leonard Evansek6-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTim Rodriguez vs Rishi Gogate0-6, 4-6
2025-06-30vs JDichak (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Michael vs Jaiganesh Rajamanickam6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRaul Zamudio vs Joseph Dichak5-7, 2-6
2025-06-23vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTim Rodriguez vs ROB SAPPENFIELD3-6, 3-6
2025-06-19vs KFranks (PPRSC)Split 11
W#2 SinglesAlexander Killeffer vs Rod Wilkes2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHani Mahgoub vs Tom Stapleton3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-18vs WDawson (Olde Providence)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Michael vs Jose Bermudez4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTim Rodriguez vs Gerald Quattlebaum6-7, 6-7
2025-05-19vs VDatta (Raintree)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesRaul Zamudio vs Jarret Lewis7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WDawson (Olde Providence)7119512168
2BStover/LEvansek (Blakeney)35111329218
3VDatta (Raintree)1771737255
4HMahgoub (PCC)1751939249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
David Michael
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Alexander Killeffer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Hani Mahgoub
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.09
Tim Rodriguez
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.98
Raul Zamudio
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Brian Burnett
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Michael
10W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Alexander Killeffer
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Hani Mahgoub
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.22
Tim Rodriguez
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
Raul Zamudio
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Brian Burnett
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.