Teams

Double The Fun

2022 Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over · Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-31vs Team High RollersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Viar / Errin Matechak vs Sharon Linares / Arnel Majillo6-3, 6-3
2022-07-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Rowland / Kevin McKeel vs Moira Smith / Thomas Smith1-6, 1-3
2022-07-20vs Mixed ChaosSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorraine Tacinelli / Thomas McCrary vs Karla Zedan / Aaron Owens1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKevin McKeel / Terry Lederer vs Kate Putt / David Putt6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-10vs Team High RollersWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Viar / Errin Matechak vs David Todd / Erica Smedberg7-5, 6-4
2022-07-06vs Team RCC Petite VivantsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesErrin Matechak / Steve Rieve vs Moira Smith / Thomas Smith1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesThomas McCrary / Lorraine Tacinelli vs Benjamin Butler / Jeannie Matteson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Cameron Craig
published 4
3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
David Viar
published 3.5
3.66
Lorraine Tacinelli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Nancy Rowland
published
3.10
Kevin McKeel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Thomas McCrary
published
Marcia Pokrant
published
VI Huynh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron Craig + Thomas McCrary5557% games−16.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cameron Craig
44W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
David Viar
39W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%8%92%
3.68
4
Lorraine Tacinelli
121W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Nancy Rowland
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Kevin McKeel
90W–97L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Thomas McCrary
43W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
Marcia Pokrant
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
VI Huynh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.