Teams

NEWC/Tegler/18&Over8.0MXD

2024 Neb. Mixed 18&Over · 8.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-03vs LeflerWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacob Tegler / Nicole Carmine vs Ann Elming / Patrick Sullivan6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Porath / Catherine Porath vs Justin Gibson / Kara Heim6-4, 6-4
2024-06-29vs LeflerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJustin Brinkman / Jodi Anderson vs Kara Heim / Yuto West6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesScott Porath / Jodi Nelson vs Kate Dean / Justin Gibson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarlos Riera-Ruiz / Tammy Tegler vs Stephanie Theis / Benjamin Katt6-3, 6-0
2024-06-22vs StrawheckerWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Pickering / Zachary Tegler vs Kirsten Wagner / Frank Tenkorang6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Tegler / Carlos Riera-Ruiz vs Chris Johnson / Caleb Diller6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCatherine Porath / Justin Brinkman vs Jaydn Dorr / Ty Strawhecker3-6, 4-6
2024-06-15vs LubbenWon 21
W#1 DoublesJustin Brinkman / Jodi Nelson vs Alec Lubben / Ashley Tyler6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKyle Givens / Catherine Porath vs Nancy Johnson / Erik Johnson6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBrian Vuu / Herita Akamah vs Shelly Patrick / Thad Fineran4-6, 1-6
2024-06-08vs StrawheckerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJustin Brinkman / Nicole Carmine vs Phillip Tran / Jane Strawhecker6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKyle Givens / Catherine Porath vs Hunter Royal / Kristin Streff6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHerita Akamah / Brian Vuu vs Hayden Royal / Teresa Fibich4-6, 3-6
2024-05-18vs LubbenWon 21
W#1 DoublesZachary Tegler / Stacy Pickering vs Alec Lubben / Jennifer Powell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Brinkman / Nicole Carmine vs Tyler Lubben / Barbara Scribner6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacob Tegler / Jodi Anderson vs Lincoln Chamberlin / Nancy Johnson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEWC/Tegler/18&Over8.0MXD6014410115
2NE/Erwin/Redding/18&Over8.0MXD6218618171
3Never Lost a Tailgate6215925229
4Stuva5316821206
5Strawhecker4210819151
6Lubben249920162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carlos Riera-Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.74
Herita Akamah
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.70
Justin Brinkman
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.47
Scott Porath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jodi Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Stacy Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Jacob Tegler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Tammy Tegler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Brian Vuu
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Nicole Carmine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Jodi Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Catherine Porath
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kyle Givens
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Zachary Tegler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Porath + Scott Porath41640% games−5.3% vs expected
Jacob Tegler + Tammy Tegler1732% games−12.0% vs expected
Zachary Tegler + Tammy Tegler10263% gamesnot enough data
Zachary Tegler + Catherine Porath9362% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Nelson + Scott Porath2447% gamesnot enough data
Herita Akamah + Brian Vuu1439% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Tegler + Scott Porath4156% gamesnot enough data
Scott Porath + Nicole Carmine134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlos Riera-Ruiz
27W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Herita Akamah
87W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Justin Brinkman
59W–16L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.70
Scott Porath
56W–100L career · 2 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jodi Nelson
119W–100L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Stacy Pickering
105W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Jacob Tegler
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.32
Tammy Tegler
125W–155L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Brian Vuu
33W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Nicole Carmine
125W–111L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Jodi Anderson
57W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
3.5
Catherine Porath
76W–124L career · 4 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kyle Givens
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zachary Tegler
53W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.