Teams

LOS GATOS SR 18MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX6.0

23 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Pauline Teunissen
published
3.17
Amy Beth Hansman
published 3.5
3.00
Wudi Zhou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Michelle Yoo
published
2.97
Joe Menkhaus
published 3
2.88
Amy Totte
published 3
2.83
Destiny Ortega
published 3
2.83
Ko-Yun Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Michel Schreurs
published
Ashley Pass
published 3
2.74
Gary Serbent
published
2.73
Eugene Priadka
published
2.69
Sharon Elder
published
2.58
Erin Maslaney
published
2.54
Michele Stefan
published
2.48
Subhendra Ghosh
published
2.44
Viktor Sokolenko
published
2.37
Gytis Barzdukas
published
2.25
Nancy Hembree
published
2.21
Maryann Schwartz
published
2.04
Andrea Peifer
published 2.5
1.92
Amy Barzdukas
published 2.5
Mark Stefan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Teunissen + Michel Schreurs033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Amy Beth Hansman
13W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Wudi Zhou
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Michelle Yoo
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Joe Menkhaus
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Amy Totte
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Destiny Ortega
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Ko-Yun Chen
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Michel Schreurs
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ashley Pass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Serbent
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Eugene Priadka
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Sharon Elder
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Erin Maslaney
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.58
Michele Stefan
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Subhendra Ghosh
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Viktor Sokolenko
1W–15L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Gytis Barzdukas
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
Nancy Hembree
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Maryann Schwartz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Andrea Peifer
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Amy Barzdukas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Mark Stefan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.