← Teams

N OR-THPRD-Vans

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
James Takahashi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Janet Ha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Johan Hong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Larry Van
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Tri Pham
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
THAO VAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Betty Roux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Zhong Lei
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Lani Chu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.91
Catherine Huang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-03-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLani Chu - (DQ) / Larry Van vs Carmen Timberlake / Rufus Timberlake6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTri Pham / Lei Ma vs Joseph Siri / Milla Woller6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTHAO VAN / Johan Hong vs ROSS GREEN / Jennifer Cox6-0, 6-4
2023-03-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPeg McClendon / Fred Buller vs Lani Chu - (DQ) / Robert Truong6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Huang / Zhong Lei vs Amy Korkowski / Greg Korkowski6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLei Ma / Tri Pham vs Ellen Wood / Thomas Harvey6-4, 6-4
2023-02-26Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesThomas Croll / Erin Dineen vs Lani Chu - (DQ) / Robert Truong6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCatherine Huang / Zhong Lei vs Sally Papadimas / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLei Ma / Tri Pham vs Nadine Hazard / Ralf Bednarz7-6, 6-1
2023-02-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLani Chu - (DQ) / Tri Pham vs David Williams / Claudia Porter6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesZhong Lei / Catherine Huang vs Anne Larson / Henri Cross6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetty Roux / Johan Hong vs Dave Sato / Janet Hummel6-3, 7-5
2023-02-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJames Takahashi / Janet Ha vs Heather Dale / Octavian Tudorache6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesZhong Lei / THAO VAN vs Olga Senashova / Chris Cormack6-0, 6-2
2023-01-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJanet Ha / James Takahashi vs Thomas Croll / Angela Diaz de Leon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesZhong Lei / Catherine Huang vs Ralf Bednarz / Sally Papadimas6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLarry Van / Lani Chu - (DQ) vs Thomas Bollaert / Erin Dineen7-5, 6-1
2023-01-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJanet Ha / James Takahashi vs William Seidl / Julia Plowman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Van / Lei Ma vs David Bean / Erin Gleason7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesZhong Lei / Betty Roux vs Joshua Lewis / Kate Quisling7-5, 7-5
2023-01-06Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJanet Ha / James Takahashi vs Frank Brown / Nicole Norby6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLarry Van / Lani Chu - (DQ) vs Daniel Chippa / Jane Shu7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBetty Roux / Johan Hong vs Edmund Yuan / Holly Twain6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
James Takahashi
101W–39L career
0%96%4%
3.39
3.5
Janet Ha
105W–56L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Johan Hong
79W–53L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Larry Van
53W–28L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tri Pham
35W–41L career
1%98%0%
3.25
3
THAO VAN
62W–28L career
0%51%49%
3.11
3.5
Betty Roux
101W–106L career · type A
18%82%0%
3.08
3.5
Zhong Lei
65W–39L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3
Lani Chu
9W–30L career
0%84%16%
2.96
3
Catherine Huang
94W–61L career
0%94%6%
2.91

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.