Teams

Trilevel Mens 40&Over- Los Tiburones

2023 Tri Level 40 & Over · 40+ 3.0-4.0 Mens

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesJorge Alvarez / Hector Rivera Martinez vs Jose Sierra-Pagan / Xavier Rosario7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-12-12vs Trilevel Mens 40&Over- Tri FiebreLost 01
L#2 DoublesJorge Alvarez / Hector Rivera Martinez vs Manuel Arroyo / Mark Maser1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesManuel Principe Acosta / Hector Rivera Martinez vs Jose Sierra-Pagan / Jaime Melendez Ayala6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-12-09vs Trilevel Mens 40&Over- Tri FiebreLost 02
L#1 DoublesHarold Wathey-Colon / Jorge J Ocasio vs Julio Valdes / Jorge Marfisi2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJorge Alvarez / Alejandro Rivera Pagan vs JAVIER CABEZUDO / Manuel Arroyo3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ 3.0-4.0 Mens have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Harold Wathey-Colon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
3.33
Alejandro Rivera Pagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Rafael Morales
published
3.13
Hector Rivera Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Manuel Principe Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Jorge Alvarez
published
2.80
Jorge Belgodere
published
2.72
Emma M Cestero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Claudio Reck
published 3
Jorge J Ocasio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manuel Principe Acosta + Hector Rivera Martinez3252% games+10.2% vs expected
Alejandro Rivera Pagan + Carlos Gomez Marrero9557% games+3.9% vs expected
Jorge Belgodere + Carlos Gomez Marrero404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlos Javier Sospedra Villalba
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Harold Wathey-Colon
94W–75L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Carlos Gomez Marrero
40W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Alejandro Rivera Pagan
71W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Rafael Morales
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Hector Rivera Martinez
47W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Manuel Principe Acosta
45W–89L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
Jorge Alvarez
22W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jorge Belgodere
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Emma M Cestero
114W–126L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Claudio Reck
13W–32L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.48
Jorge J Ocasio
31W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.