Teams

MD.Pilz

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-26vs TOC.Hagopian-EdwardsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSonia Weber / Donna Kemp vs Taqiyya Yasin / Matalaba Napier0-6, 3-6
2024-04-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesSonia Weber / Lisa Kropilak vs Mira Kim / Christina Peters6-0, 6-4
2024-03-08vs CAS.GilbertWon 10
W#1 SinglesSonia Weber vs Megan Kimsey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Jaclyn Englert
published
2.60
Sonia Weber
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.50
Deanna Hart
published 3
2.45
Sheridan Orr
published
2.44
Steph Frohock
published
2.41
Laurie Godfrey
published
2.41
Caroline Stallings
published 2.5
2.35
Mary Ashley Hill
published
2.33
Annie Pilz
published 2.5
2.24
Cheryl McCurdy
published 2.5
2.16
Katherine Ruffolo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaclyn Englert
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Sonia Weber
80W–115L career · 7 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Deanna Hart
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Sheridan Orr
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%63%37%
2.45
Steph Frohock
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%66%34%
2.44
Laurie Godfrey
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Caroline Stallings
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%75%25%
2.41
Mary Ashley Hill
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Annie Pilz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Cheryl McCurdy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
Katherine Ruffolo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.