Teams

CCO/Galloway-Kaul

2026 Marion Combo 18 & Over Fall · 7.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCO/Galloway-Kaul000000
2GO/Dellovade000000
3FK/Millsaps000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Diana Royo
published 4
3.87
Eileen Lombardo
published 4
3.86
3.79
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.72
Dana Pine
published 4
3.68
Andrea Harden
published 4
3.45
Dina Sapienza
published
3.41
Maria Oliver
published
3.37
Lucy Kaul
published
3.34
Kannika Torres
published
3.31
Hollie Powell
published
3.26
Rebecca Long
published
3.25
Carla Intal
published 3.5
3.25
Doreen Raudenbush
published 3.5
Jingyi Weeks
published
Nicole DeBolt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Elizabeth Dickerson
264W–115L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Dana Pine
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Andrea Harden
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
Maria Oliver
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Lucy Kaul
19W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Kannika Torres
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Hollie Powell
26W–70L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Rebecca Long
24W–28L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Carla Intal
112W–52L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Doreen Raudenbush
41W–28L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Jingyi Weeks
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicole DeBolt
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.