Teams

Brookstone III (Cheryl Harvey)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-01-14vs Sibley Forest (Melissa Waller)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Harvey / Taylor Lambertson vs CASEY SONKE / Melissa Waller3-6, 6-4, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Potkey / Beth Piazzi vs Teri Jackson / Danielle Charles3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCherlyn Humburg / Kelly Crotts vs Catie Connolly / KELLY HAYDEN3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKelly Crotts / Cherlyn Humburg vs Julie Thomas / Rhonda Bush4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Magee vs Aubrey Biddle2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAmanda Harvey / Courtney Potkey vs Angela Holley / Monica Marks3-6, 6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTaylor Lambertson / Kristy Bishop vs Jessica Barba / Luiza Jones3-6, 6-4, 6-3
W#4 DoublesJill Lambertson / JoAnn Janusek vs Danielle Duce / Wanda Gallo1-6, 6-4, 6-4
2024-11-16vs Seven Hills (Megan White)*Lost 14
W#1 DoublesAmanda Harvey / Taylor Lambertson vs Stacey Coble / Jessica Ginn6-1, 1-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Magee vs Kristin Bowie2-6, 7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristie Cowan / Kitty Smith vs Erin Coke / Chrissie Harrell1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCherlyn Humburg / Kristy Bishop vs Megan White / Tedi Petito1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Ditthardt / Courtney Potkey vs Carol Edwards / Erica Rutledge1-6, 1-6
2024-11-09vs Marietta CC (Pamela Cleaver)*Lost 14
W#1 DoublesAmanda Harvey / Taylor Lambertson vs Peggy McNeel / Julie Merendino6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBeth Piazzi vs Catherine Leggett3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Crotts / Courtney Potkey vs Melanie Hailey / Stacie Lafleur6-1, 6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristie Cowan / JoAnn Janusek vs Chrystal Campbell / Megan McNeel6-3, 1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Ditthardt / Jill Lambertson vs Sherra Bowman / Pamela Cleaver2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Taylor Lambertson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.89
Cherlyn Humburg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Kristie Cowan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Amanda Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Courtney Potkey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Kitty Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Kelly Crotts
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Kelly Magee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.49
Beth Piazzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Kristy Bishop
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cheryl Harvey
published 3.5
3.20
Deryl Heflin
published 3.5
3.19
Jill Lambertson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
JoAnn Janusek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Ditthardt
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristie Cowan + Courtney Potkey9262% games+8.7% vs expected
Kitty Smith + Kelly Crotts5161% games+6.6% vs expected
Amanda Harvey + Taylor Lambertson12361% games+4.0% vs expected
Cherlyn Humburg + Kitty Smith5160% games+3.6% vs expected
Cheryl Harvey + Lisa Ditthardt6453% games+3.0% vs expected
Kelly Crotts + Courtney Potkey7952% games+2.4% vs expected
Cherlyn Humburg + Kelly Crotts4256% games+1.6% vs expected
Kristie Cowan + Kelly Crotts14654% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Lambertson
29W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Cherlyn Humburg
23W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
Kristie Cowan
59W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Amanda Harvey
39W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Courtney Potkey
31W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Kitty Smith
42W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Kelly Crotts
55W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Kelly Magee
30W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Beth Piazzi
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kristy Bishop
34W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Harvey
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deryl Heflin
21W–28L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Jill Lambertson
20W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
JoAnn Janusek
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Ditthardt
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.