Teams

Three Chopt Young's Mean Machine

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-30vs Raintree Raqueteers RaghavanLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Young / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Lee Brooks / Geoff Campbell3-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs Belmont Richman BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Manmeet Mahajan vs Majd Babik / Richard Sherman4-6, 3-6
2024-05-09vs ACAC HollomonWon 10
W#2 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Andy Tucker vs Jeff Bosch / Karl Koenig3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-02vs CCV WherryWon 10
W#3 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Thomas Young vs Joseph Parker / Tommy Thompson6-4, 6-2
2024-04-25vs SCC RiehmWon 10
W#3 DoublesTim Parks / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Ken Riehm / Charles Means6-2, 6-1
2024-04-18vs Willow Oaks DuntonWon 10
W#2 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs Bryan Pendleton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Everett Hettema
published
3.92
Jeremy Theisen
published
3.75
Bhargavaram Kallam
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Andy Tucker
published 4
3.67
Truong Nguyen
published
3.61
Tim Parks
published
3.60
William Cosby
published
3.37
Manmeet Mahajan
published
3.34
Robert Preservati
published
3.10
Don Ha
published
Jeffrey Pope
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Parks + William Cosby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Everett Hettema
14W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Jeremy Theisen
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Bhargavaram Kallam
146W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Truong Nguyen
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.67
Tim Parks
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
William Cosby
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Manmeet Mahajan
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
Robert Preservati
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Don Ha
15W–30L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jeffrey Pope
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.