Teams

Phan - All the Singles Ladies 3.0

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Neela Mahanty6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJulie Cabaniss vs Emily Schabacker6-7, 4-0
2025-10-18vs Biggs - Serve & Slay 3.0 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Elizabeth Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Candace Tomczak6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Betty Guzman Dowdy7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesPaola Osaki vs Neela Mahanty6-3, 6-4
2025-10-09vs Biggs - Serve & Slay 3.0 SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Amy Luo6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJulie Cabaniss vs Pamela Peseux6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Angela Sharma6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPaola Osaki vs Jennifer Lora Gleason6-1, 6-2
2025-09-30vs Biggs - Serve & Slay 3.0 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesPaola Osaki vs Candace Tomczak6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJulie Cabaniss vs Francesca Dougherty6-2, 6-3
2025-09-22vs Smith - Sets In The City 3.0 SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPaola Osaki vs Betty Guzman Dowdy6-4, 3-3
L#2 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Elizabeth McLeod2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-20vs Biggs - Serve & Slay 3.0 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesJulie Cabaniss vs Elizabeth Smith4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Jennifer Yapsuga1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Erin Nguyen3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Elizabeth McLeod6-3, 6-0
2025-09-10vs Biggs - Serve & Slay 3.0 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesPaola Osaki vs Jennifer Yapsuga6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Tannan Hagyard6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJulie Cabaniss vs Shannon Biggs6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Paola Osaki
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.14
Heather Nesti
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3
3.04
Keyonna Baker
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
2.97
Caitlin Boyle
published 3
2.89
Julie Cabaniss
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.83
Rebecca Clark
published
2.59
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Clark + Julie Cabaniss7449% games−0.7% vs expected
Keyonna Baker + Cecilia-Hien Phan5153% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paola Osaki
55W–33L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3
Heather Nesti
180W–165L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Keyonna Baker
165W–125L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Caitlin Boyle
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Julie Cabaniss
126W–124L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Rebecca Clark
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cecilia-Hien Phan
140W–186L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.