Teams

Wolson- Bell Swingers 4.0 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-14vs Burke/Baerenwald 18+ W23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDawn Reidinger vs Jennifer Jorgenson2-6, 4-6
2023-02-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDawn Reidinger vs Melissa Cassidy0-6, 3-6
2023-01-10vs Toleu- 4.0Ever Young 18+ W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDanielle Schwier / Dawn Reidinger vs Randa Schuster / Pamela van Ert6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Elizabeth Kruse
published 4
3.77
Jennifer Bartz
published
Danielle Schwier
published 4
3.64
Jill DeSanto
published
3.59
Joanna Poinar
published
3.57
Kirsten Gregerson
published
3.56
Smitha Abbott
published
3.56
Ellen Klos
published 4
3.54
Emily Heying
published 4
3.51
Caron Dwyer
published 4
3.50
Shani Graber
published
3.50
Leeann Bell
published
3.37
Somia Mourad
published
3.36
Kim Wolson
published
3.34
Dawn Reidinger
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Kirsten Galloway
published
3.20
Jennifer Flanigan
published
Lisa Rounds
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Somia Mourad + Kirsten Galloway5446% games+3.7% vs expected
Jennifer Bartz + Jennifer Flanigan2441% games−2.6% vs expected
Leeann Bell + Emily Heying1443% games−6.5% vs expected
Caron Dwyer + Ellen Klos1837% games−8.8% vs expected
Leeann Bell + Somia Mourad0536% gamesnot enough data
Kim Wolson + Kirsten Galloway213 matchesnot enough data
Smitha Abbott + Ellen Klos123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Flanigan + Kirsten Galloway303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Kruse
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Jennifer Bartz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Danielle Schwier
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill DeSanto
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
Joanna Poinar
18W–27L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Kirsten Gregerson
40W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.57
Smitha Abbott
16W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
4
Ellen Klos
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Emily Heying
2W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Caron Dwyer
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Shani Graber
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Leeann Bell
9W–29L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Somia Mourad
20W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
Kim Wolson
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Dawn Reidinger
111W–146L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Kirsten Galloway
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Jennifer Flanigan
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Lisa Rounds
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.