Teams

Westwood Combs-Pokrywka

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs CCV-ReifsniderLost 01
L#2 SinglesJennifer White vs Kim Cressy2-6, 3-6
2024-06-05vs Wyndham-EccardWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer White vs Anna Gibellato6-4, 6-0
2024-05-31vs Hermitage- WiertelWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer White vs Anne Stewart Blaylock6-2, 6-4
2024-05-29vs Raintree- LloydLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer White / Catherine Stanley vs Pam Koch / Lydia Smith1-6, 6-7
2024-05-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer White vs Andrea Hill6-4, 6-0
2024-05-22vs KRA Fleck/WalekLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer White / Heather Harker vs Stephanie Murtaugh / Rachel Piacentini1-6, 1-6
2024-05-20vs Burkwood CookWon 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer White vs Sandy Cook6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kristin Zach
published
3.34
Jennifer White
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.28
Amy Ringberg
published 3.5
3.22
Meghan Dexter
published
3.18
Heather Harker
published
3.17
Rose Yuen
published
2.92
Cathy Barksdale
published 3
2.69
Janet Livick
published
Katherine Towler
published
Louise O'Connor
published
Mary Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Yuen + Meghan Dexter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Zach
33W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jennifer White
104W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Amy Ringberg
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Meghan Dexter
27W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Heather Harker
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Rose Yuen
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Cathy Barksdale
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Catherine Stanley
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
Janet Livick
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Towler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Louise O'Connor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Wood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.