Teams

CV-Sun City PD/Groves

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesMona Klimmek / Jill Delaney vs Katie Buechel / Suzanne Young6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJill Delaney / Barbara McDonald vs Ann Tennyson / Rebecca Jasmine6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Wolfe / Jill Delaney vs Jill Day / Janice Creager6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-01-31vs CV-Palm Valley/Peller & M WoodwardLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Groves / Jill Delaney vs COLLEEN Jarrar / Julie Varon6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-01-17vs CV-Mission Hills CC/MoskowitzWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara McDonald / Jill Delaney vs Susan Sheridan / Linda Moskowitz6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Lori Greenman
published
3.59
Linda Johnson
published
3.49
Patricia Taylor
published
3.36
Jill Delaney
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Terri Johnson
published
Faith Ricciuti
published 3
2.69
Ann Oswald
published 3
Michele Mcgee
published
Mona Klimmek
published
Patti Groves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Johnson + Mona Klimmek404 matchesnot enough data
Linda Johnson + Jill Delaney303 matchesnot enough data
Jill Delaney + Patti Groves033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Greenman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.90
Linda Johnson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Patricia Taylor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.49
3.5
Jill Delaney
102W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Terri Johnson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
3
Faith Ricciuti
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ann Oswald
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Michele Mcgee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mona Klimmek
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patti Groves
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.