Teams

VTC-Wilcox/Gaylor

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.65 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Dean Gaylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Kevin Muck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
JT Smith
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Alan Jones
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Andy LaFrazia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
John Hapke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Tammy LaFrazia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Gaylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Julie Gorecki
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Smith / JT Smith vs Steve Elmer / Laura Rundle6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Gorecki / Julie Gorecki vs Jill Boyce / Shawn Boyce6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Burak / Alan Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-17Won 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jones / Alan Jones vs Rachel Nies / David Hoiland6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDean Gaylor / Kelley Gaylor vs John Yu / Garrene Mcgale4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTammy LaFrazia / Andy LaFrazia vs Jeffrey Gates / Lee Gates2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-10Won 21
L#1 DoublesRobin Burak / John Hapke vs Ron Press / Karen Groenweghe6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDean Gaylor / Kelley Gaylor vs Vera Vos / Edwin Becker6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Gorecki / Julie Gorecki vs Paul Kachel / Gwen van Meter7-6, 6-2
2025-04-27Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor vs Kaoru Nelson / Doyoung Moon6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Kjos / John Hapke vs Patty Chen / Sy Cha0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Smith / JT Smith vs Mihee Park / Chinwoo Kim6-2, 6-3
2025-04-19Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRobin Burak / Kevin Muck vs Kaoru Nelson / JIN PARK6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Smith / JT Smith vs Misug Kim / Daniel M Kim6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Alan Jones vs Parul Saxena / Chinwoo Kim6-3, 7-5
2025-04-12Won 21
W#1 DoublesTammy LaFrazia / Andy LaFrazia vs Jian Xu / Scott Keeney6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Gorecki / Daniel Gorecki vs Paul Kreiter / Jing Feng6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Smith / JT Smith vs Zachary Wright / Kim Wright6-3, 6-3
2025-04-05Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Hapke / Robin Burak vs Sam Ko / Kim Tellin6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Steve Elmer / Laura Rundle6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlan Jones / Stephanie Jones vs Timothea Barnatan / Colin Looi3-1
2025-03-30Won 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / John Hapke vs Kerri Patrick / Philip Sterling1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Gorecki / Daniel Gorecki vs Scott Mayer / Lisa Mayer6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor vs James Thomas / Amy Thomas6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Dean Gaylor
88W–63L career
12%88%1%
3.66
4
Kevin Muck
64W–90L career
9%91%0%
3.62
4
JT Smith
83W–90L career
20%80%0%
3.56
3.5
Alan Jones
96W–69L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Andy LaFrazia
65W–34L career
4%86%10%
3.33
3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Tammy LaFrazia
44W–25L career
not enough data
3.5
Kelley Gaylor
68W–64L career
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Julie Gorecki
33W–22L career
11%89%0%
3.15
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.