Teams

MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring · Women 5.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.75 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-23vs YellowLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hoyos / Lindsey Whitehead vs Ashley Hennis / Victoria Zielinski6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2021-07-11vs YellowWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Rist / Amanda Pratzel vs Ashley Hennis / Mila Bey6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSampada Coster vs Victoria Zielinski6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTracey K Trembath / Melissa Hoyos vs Shannon Gordon-Carney / Patricia Purcell4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-07-10vs YellowWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Pratzel / Katherine Rist vs Ashley Hennis / Mila Bey6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSampada Coster vs Victoria Zielinski6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTracey K Trembath / Melissa Hoyos vs Patricia Purcell / Shannon Gordon-Carney6-3, 6-2
2021-07-03vs YellowWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gadsky / Jennifer Mckeown vs Kim Steinmetz / Shannon Gordon-Carney0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLindsey Whitehead vs Ashley Hennis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAbbie Bradley / Carolyn Kramer vs Mila Bey / Victoria Zielinski6-2, 6-3
2021-06-30vs YellowWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mckeown / Jennifer Gadsky vs Kim Steinmetz / Shannon Gordon-Carney6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsey Whitehead vs Ashley Hennis6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Kramer / Abbie Bradley vs Victoria Zielinski / Mila Bey6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W41123783
2Yellow1431226158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.04
Amanda Pratzel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.43
Katherine Rist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Tracey K Trembath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Abbie Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jennifer Gadsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Mckeown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Whitehead
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Hoyos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sampada Coster
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey K Trembath + Abbie Bradley161054% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Pratzel
66W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%38%62%
5.04
Katherine Rist
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
4.43
Tracey K Trembath
58W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Abbie Bradley
28W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
Jennifer Gadsky
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Mckeown
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindsey Whitehead
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Melissa Hoyos
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sampada Coster
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.