Teams

Hills/Pullaro/40&Over2.5W

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.93 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-05vs Buckhorn Lobstars - J. LindemulderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDru Albano / Raquel Pullaro vs Catherine Kotson / Amanda Smith6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBecky Kuntz vs Shannon Tompkins6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesClaudia Chao / Becky Kuntz vs Michelle Graba / Liza Geist7-6, 7-6
W#1 DoublesBecky Kuntz / Kelly Miller vs Lisa Lalis / Michele Curtin6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs VEENA RAMESH7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBecky Kuntz / Dru Albano vs Jennifer Berk / Sarah Lindbeck6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRaquel Pullaro vs Sarah Boe6-1, 6-2
2025-04-25vs Avila Aces - I. PetersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Dru Albano vs Monica Illas / Sally Sierra6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Becky Kuntz vs Karan Orbegoso / Siwon Jang6-4, 7-5
2025-04-18vs VDF String Queens - S. CornellWon 20
W#1 DoublesDru Albano / Raquel Pullaro vs Linda Frank / Letitia Morrison4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBecky Kuntz vs Brittany Kissell6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Becky Kuntz
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.77
Jackie Botet
published 3
2.69
Raquel Pullaro
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.67
Dru Albano
published 3
2.62
Dimple Dilkhush
published 3
2.60
Claudia Chao
published 3
2.09
Marlene sokol
published
1.75
Tamara Inauen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Pullaro + Becky Kuntz7753% games+10.5% vs expected
Jackie Botet + Dimple Dilkhush9256% games+2.4% vs expected
Jackie Botet + Dru Albano314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Kuntz
53W–62L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Jackie Botet
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 10 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dru Albano
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Dimple Dilkhush
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Claudia Chao
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Marlene sokol
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Cecilia Fanning Mitchell
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.75
Tamara Inauen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.