Teams

KS/Shipp/55&Over8.0M

2022 KS 55 & Over Adult League · 8.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-05vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadLost 12
W#1 DoublesGreg Lutz / Kurt Davids vs Rick Thompson / Gabriel Yankey6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesThomas Perkuhn / Robert Schmidt vs Mark Ruggles / Steve King3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJimmy Watson / Thomas Alexander vs Neal Crowell / Ron Cox4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-05vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 30
W#1 DoublesKurt Davids / Gary Shipp vs Steve King / Mark Ruggles6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Werner / Greg Lutz vs Neal Crowell / Ron Cox4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Alexander / Jimmy Watson vs Rick Thompson / Gabriel Yankey7-6, 6-3
2022-02-12vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Perkuhn / Gary Shipp vs Mark Melhorn / Mark Ruggles6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKent Lammers / Greg Lutz vs Neal Crowell / Ron Cox6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJames Werner / Kurt Davids vs Dennis Patterson / Steve King6-3, 6-2
2022-02-12vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 21
L#1 DoublesKent Lammers / Kurt Davids vs Mark Ruggles / Mark Melhorn3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Lutz / James Werner vs Neal Crowell / Cameron Prichard6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Alexander / Jimmy Watson vs James Thomson / Steve King6-1, 6-1
2022-02-05vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 21
W#1 DoublesGary Shipp / Thomas Perkuhn vs Rick Thompson / Gabriel Yankey6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTim Swope / Robert Schmidt vs Neal Crowell / Tom Johnson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKent Lammers / James Werner vs Mark Melhorn / Ron Cox6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-05vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Swope / Kent Lammers vs Alexander Lee / Steve King6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJames Werner / Robert Schmidt vs Rick Thompson / Gabriel Yankey6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGary Shipp / Thomas Perkuhn vs Ron Cox / James Thomson6-0, 6-4
2022-01-22vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 21
L#1 DoublesKurt Davids / Robert Schmidt vs Neal Crowell / Cameron Prichard2-6, 6-3, 6-7
W#2 DoublesThomas Perkuhn / Gary Shipp vs Alexander Lee / Mark Melhorn6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTim Swope / James Werner vs Steve King / Ron Cox6-0, 6-2
2022-01-22vs Patterson - Genesis, Rock RoadWon 21
L#1 DoublesGary Shipp / Robert Schmidt vs Neal Crowell / Ron Cox5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTim Swope / James Werner vs Dennis Patterson / Mark Melhorn6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesThomas Perkuhn / Kent Lammers vs Steve King / Alexander Lee6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Thomas Perkuhn
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Gary Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Chris Boiteau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
James Werner
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.65
Greg Lutz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Kurt Davids
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jimmy Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kent Lammers
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kurt Reid
published
Robert Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Thomas Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Swope
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Lutz + Thomas Perkuhn8260% games+0.9% vs expected
Gary Shipp + Thomas Perkuhn23859% games+0.0% vs expected
Thomas Perkuhn + Kent Lammers9257% games−5.4% vs expected
Thomas Alexander + Thomas Perkuhn2544% games−8.4% vs expected
Kurt Davids + Gary Shipp7163% gamesnot enough data
Gary Shipp + Robert Schmidt6256% gamesnot enough data
Kurt Davids + Tim Swope3252% gamesnot enough data
Gary Shipp + Greg Lutz224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Perkuhn
104W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Gary Shipp
121W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Chris Boiteau
51W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
James Werner
30W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Greg Lutz
58W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Kurt Davids
65W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Jimmy Watson
43W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kent Lammers
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kurt Reid
28W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Schmidt
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Alexander
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Swope
36W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.