Teams

BC-MCC/AmySchmargen

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-12vs BC-SouthEnd/ColleenJohnsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesKirsten Helvey / Sarah Nedelman vs Kristin Almeida / Noreen Wenjen6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMonika Kiznis vs Huong Mary Lai6-1, 6-0
2021-06-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicole Brown / Kirsten Helvey vs Sara Baird / Melina Symons6-3, 6-4
2021-06-05vs BC-MiraCosta/AudraStellerWon 10
W#3 DoublesKirsten Helvey / Ellen Lauricella vs Kristy Kinsey Brosius / Jennifer Morrow6-1, 6-4
2021-05-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Nedelman / Kirsten Helvey vs Kristi Samuelson / Rebecca Schrock6-1, 6-1
2021-05-22vs BC-LLW-MCC/LeasaIrelandLost 01
L#3 DoublesKirsten Helvey / Amy Digiaro vs Elizabeth Alexander / Kimberlee Kelly4-6, 6-7
2021-05-02vs BC-MiraCosta/LananaGoldsteinWon 10
W#2 SinglesMonika Kiznis vs Kitty Fitzgerald6-2, 6-2
2021-04-18vs BC-Kramer/DonnaAshcraftWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Nedelman / Kirsten Helvey vs Donna Ashcraft / Diane Landon6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMonika Kiznis vs Tanya Drawer6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kirsten Helvey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Monika Kiznis
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.79
Robin Terry
published
3.67
Jeanette Chun
published
3.63
Ellen Lauricella
published 4
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
published
3.47
Anne Gumm
published 3.5
3.27
Sandy Quigley
published
3.21
Mari Bellas
published
3.17
Maricel Rocha
published
3.10
Rachel Alexander
published
3.08
Teal Levine
published
3.04
Amy Schmargen
published 3
Eileen Baral
published
Lisa Handelman
published
Martha Kretzmer
published
Tracey Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monika Kiznis + Kirsten Helvey5067% gamesnot enough data
Jeanette Chun + Kirsten Helvey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kirsten Helvey
124W–71L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Monika Kiznis
101W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
Robin Terry
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
Jeanette Chun
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ellen Lauricella
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
Sarah Nedelman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Anne Gumm
67W–51L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sandy Quigley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Mari Bellas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Maricel Rocha
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Teal Levine
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Amy Schmargen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.04
Eileen Baral
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Handelman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Martha Kretzmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracey Carey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.