Teams

Hawaii/Haughney/65&Over9.0W

2022 Adult 65 and Over League · 9.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / WEST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-14vs Team 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Dorenzo / Leslie Haughney vs Leslie Wilshusen / Diane Chaves6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Firek / Kathleen Lum vs Julie Park / Liliana Bruggemann4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLiane Depontes / Fletcher Olson vs Marsha Speck / Laurie Jo Rogers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-04vs Team 2Won 21
W#1 DoublesMary Firek / Kathleen Lum vs Julie Park / Liliana Bruggemann6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Ho / Abbie Murray vs Rosalie Holland / Melanie Brown2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLiane Depontes / Judith Jennet vs Alice Shingle / Laurie Jo Rogers6-4, 6-2
2022-09-30vs Team 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Ho / Abbie Murray vs Melanie Brown / Rosalie Holland3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Haughney / Deborah Dorenzo vs Leslie Wilshusen / Diane Chaves6-7, 5-3
W#3 DoublesFletcher Olson / Judith Jennet vs Marsha Speck / Laurie Jo Rogers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hawaii/Haughney/65&Over9.0W30631082
2Team 203361495

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Kathleen Lum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
3.71
Leslie Haughney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Fletcher Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Deborah Dorenzo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Judith Jennet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Abbie Murray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Christine Ho
published 3.5
Liane Depontes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Firek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Yolanda Therrien
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Jennet + Liane Depontes11358% games+2.7% vs expected
Deborah Dorenzo + Leslie Haughney16663% games−5.8% vs expected
Mary Firek + Kathleen Lum3450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathleen Lum
34W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Leslie Haughney
80W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Fletcher Olson
58W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Deborah Dorenzo
36W–31L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Judith Jennet
125W–106L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Abbie Murray
38W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Christine Ho
13W–36L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Liane Depontes
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Firek
21W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yolanda Therrien
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.