Teams

TLOV Team Brad

2023 Tri-Level Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-15vs SportsplexWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhilippe Pultar / Rains Jordan vs David West / Edger Bout6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJake Guralnick / Steven Erickson vs Richard Birgler / Joseph Paoli2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesGeoff Tarson / Nicholas Godec vs Noah Johnson / David Levin6-2, 7-5
2023-04-01vs Cross CourtLost 12
W#1 DoublesRains Jordan / David Maise vs Nils Kenaston / Todd Ritter4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathen Clerici / Brad Dunn vs John Sirman / Srikant Ganesan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDouglas Milford / Geoff Tarson vs Charlie Michelin / Marc Alston4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-25vs Southern: TSR: Mid-Court CrisisLost 12
L#1 DoublesRains Jordan / Per Blomquist vs James Koob / Sean Burns6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Eng / Jake Guralnick vs Joey Asher / Phil van Oss5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeoff Tarson / Nicholas Godec vs Thomas Tokarski / Carlo Saenz6-2, 7-5
2023-03-18vs Break Point TennisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPer Blomquist / Philippe Pultar vs Sidney Hymes / Gregory Mitchell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNathen Clerici / Scott Mallen vs Dan Stone / Brian Tsai6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKirk Allen / Nicholas Godec vs David Bresnahan / Harrison Barritt7-5, 6-3
2023-03-04vs SportsplexLost 12
L#1 DoublesRains Jordan / TN Thompson vs Pankaj Arora / MICHAEL PEDZIWIATR4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJake Guralnick / Steven Erickson vs Rod Mano / Chris Franke5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDouglas Milford / Jason Geib vs David Levin / Kans Lau0-6, 2-6
2023-02-25vs Cross CourtWon 30
W#1 DoublesPer Blomquist / Philippe Pultar vs Nils Kenaston / Eric Foret6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniel Eng / Nathen Clerici vs DShaun Parker / John Sirman6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGeoff Tarson / Nicholas Godec vs Charlie Michelin / Nathan Kerxhalli6-1, 6-1
2023-02-05vs Southern: TSR: Mid-Court CrisisWon 21
W#1 DoublesRains Jordan / Per Blomquist vs Eric Perrot / Mark Cooper7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Eng / Brad Dunn vs Joey Asher / Phil van Oss2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDouglas Milford / Geoff Tarson vs Thomas Tokarski / Michael Schwartz6-1, 6-1
2023-01-28vs Break Point TennisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhilippe Pultar / Per Blomquist vs Shane Zimmerman / Matthew Petock6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Eng / Steven Erickson vs Sidney Hymes / Gregory Mitchell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDouglas Milford / Nicholas Godec vs Charles Laing / GERALD PROTHEROE7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Break Point Tennis - A0741734221
2Cross Court0771434236
3TLOV Team Brad0816820197
4Southern: TSR: Mid-Court Crisis0815920190
5Matchpoint0815921179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Philippe Pultar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Steven Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Nathen Clerici
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Nicholas Godec
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.35
Jake Guralnick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Brad Dunn
published 3.5
Daniel Eng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Scott Mallen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Kirk Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Maise
published
Douglas Milford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Geoff Tarson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rains Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Anderson
published
Thomas Turco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jake Guralnick + Steven Erickson7456% games−5.7% vs expected
Geoff Tarson + Nicholas Godec303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philippe Pultar
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Steven Erickson
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Nathen Clerici
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Nicholas Godec
66W–14L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
Jake Guralnick
31W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Brad Dunn
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Daniel Eng
22W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Mallen
27W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Kirk Allen
43W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
David Maise
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Douglas Milford
13W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Geoff Tarson
26W–8L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rains Jordan
32W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Anderson
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Turco
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.