Teams

Miller/40/7.5/CM/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 16 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Metairie Country Club
Sep 30 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Charles MillerKevin Ericksen
Oct 7 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Oct 14 6:30 PM
Capitano's Tennis & Athletic Club
2026-09-02vs Walker/40/7.5/CM/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesKevin Ericksen / John Lindsey vs Danny Russo / Christopher Taylor1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChad Bloodworth / David Varisco vs James Graham / Adam Goldberg6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeremy Tuman / Gason Nelson vs Erich Weishaupt / Scott Martina1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
2Legrand/40/7.5/CM/Caps000000
3Walker/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
4Costello/40/7.5/CM/MCC000000
5Bonnet/40/7.5/CM/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Chad Bloodworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
John Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Andre Apatini
published 3.5
3.37
Phuong Nguyen
published
3.30
Gason Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Gabriel Tender
published
3.23
Russell Foster
published
3.19
Jeremy Tuman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kevin Ericksen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
David Callaway
published 3.5
2.89
Leo Krasnozhon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andre Apatini + Kevin Ericksen134 matchesnot enough data
Russell Foster + Jeremy Tuman314 matchesnot enough data
John Lindsey + Chad Bloodworth033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chad Bloodworth
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
John Lindsey
5W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Andre Apatini
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
Phuong Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
Gason Nelson
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Gabriel Tender
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Russell Foster
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Jeremy Tuman
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Kevin Ericksen
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
David Callaway
3W–12L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Leo Krasnozhon
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.