Teams

OC LPC - Dianne - Sun1

2026 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Chelsea van Niekerk
published 3.5
3.59
Jill Jobran
published 3.5
3.51
Monica Barrameda
published
3.40
Maureen Dominguez
published 3.5
3.40
3.40
Michi Sim
published 3.5
3.37
Ria Lamenzo
published
3.33
Dana Orsini
published 3.5
3.31
Kellie Binder
published
3.30
Adrianne de Castro
published 3.5
3.29
Kaeko Jenni
published 3.5
3.28
Cindy Zhang
published 3.5
3.18
Cecilia Mai
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Binder + Adrianne de Castro4352% games−1.9% vs expected
Michi Sim + Kaeko Jenni2352% gamesnot enough data
Michi Sim + Kellie Binder303 matchesnot enough data
Michi Sim + Adrianne de Castro213 matchesnot enough data
Cecilia Mai + Cindy Zhang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chelsea van Niekerk
36W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Jill Jobran
172W–46L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Monica Barrameda
30W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Maureen Dominguez
122W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Shannon Liu Castleman
26W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Michi Sim
83W–59L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Ria Lamenzo
17W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Kellie Binder
29W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Adrianne de Castro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
94W–89L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Zhang
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Cecilia Mai
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.