Teams

Adams, Amber

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-JXN · 3.5 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-23vs Sykes, JoannaLost 12
W#1 DoublesMandy Castle / Bobby Bullock vs Nealie Cooper / Matt Carpenter7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMeredith Boston / David Adams vs Cindy Page / Keaton Page4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Kimble / Lisa Little vs Jackson Pullen / Emma Pullen6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-07-14vs Ward, DarrellLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhilip Cothern / Beverly Turner vs Dante Grant / Karley Newell2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Gentry / Jodi Gentry vs Darrell Ward / Venecca Green2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Adams / Amber Mullin vs Joseph Boler / Tempestt Gilmore6-0, 7-5
2025-06-30vs Byrd, AdamLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Adams / Amber Mullin vs Ashley Howell / Jonathan Sims2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Boston / Steven Gentry vs Adam Byrd / Emma Bond4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Little / Jay Irving vs Bradley Fulton / Janice Fulton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-23vs Guthrie, HarperWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmber Mullin / David Adams vs Margaret Kovar / Davis Roberson7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Coleman / Paul Kimble vs Christian Medina / Emily Henderson6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Little / Jay Irving vs Sheila Self / Jeremy Self6-4
2025-06-09vs Pace, PhillipWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Coleman / David Adams vs Scott Holston / Elizabeth Randall3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJodi Gentry / Steven Gentry vs Mitch Stentiford / Monique Kelly7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeverly Turner / Philip Cothern vs Abram Diaz / Gabrielle Sioufi6-3, 6-3
2025-06-02vs Bailey, BenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Boston / Paul Kimble vs Beau Brady / Mandalin Blanton4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Mullin / David Adams vs Julie Barry / Tom Hickman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Little / Jay Irving vs Julie Tompkins / Andrew Stubbs6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-19vs Alexander, TerraWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Coleman / David Adams vs Julio Morales / Carla Rushing1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeverly Turner / Paul Kimble vs Stacy Seago / Ray Jost6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJay Irving / Lisa Little vs Kate Feldman / Chad Feldman6-0, 6-1
2025-05-12vs Smith, AutumnWon 21
W#1 DoublesJay Irving / Mandy Castle vs Autumn Smith / Preston SMITH6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJodi Gentry / Steven Gentry vs Geri Smith / Parker Smith6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeverly Turner / Philip Cothern vs Hayley Hayes / Jeffrey Ruffin6-2, 6-1
2025-05-05vs Dutta, SouravLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Kimble / Emily Coleman vs Bryton Hixson / Laura McMahon1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJay Irving / Meredith Boston vs Sourav Dutta / Stacey Coulter6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Adams / Amber Mullin vs Vladimir Abril / Emily Williams2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Bobby Bullock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Jay Irving
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.21
Paul Kimble
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Amber Mullin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.92
Meredith Boston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Mandy Castle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Philip Cothern
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.88
Beverly Turner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Emily Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jodi Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Turner + Paul Kimble4162% games+13.7% vs expected
Beverly Turner + Philip Cothern4254% gamesnot enough data
Bobby Bullock + Mandy Castle4158% gamesnot enough data
Steven Gentry + Jodi Gentry2355% gamesnot enough data
Bobby Bullock + Beverly Turner404 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Castle + Jay Irving314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bobby Bullock
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jay Irving
30W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Paul Kimble
29W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
3.5
Amber Mullin
22W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Meredith Boston
16W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Mandy Castle
25W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Philip Cothern
28W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3.5
Beverly Turner
28W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
Emily Coleman
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jodi Gentry
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Gentry
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.