Teams

Quail Creek - Tumulty

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-23vs Sterling Oaks - PacanaLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Hole / Jennifer Sherman vs Stephanie Foley / Vesna Petrovic3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Benita Brown vs Laurie Puddester / Michelle Suppes2-6, 3-6
2022-03-08vs Grey Oaks - SardarLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Karen Hole vs Susan Caskey / Peggy Hogan3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Stein / Julianne Lassus vs Nancy Harbert / MacKenzie Rickman1-6, 2-6
2022-03-01vs Marco YMCA - J. HeiseSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Sherman / Karen Hole vs Ann Heinauer / Brita Swanson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Amanda Mallette vs Jacqueline Heise / Carrie Sullivan1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-23vs COLLIER - Grey Oaks - LaveryLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulianne Lassus / Nancy Nichols vs Cristina Arango / Marzenna Nowak0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Kelly Stein vs Kathy Healy / Debra Logue4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Hole / Jennifer Sherman vs Melanie McLean / Lori Murphy6-1, 6-1
2022-02-22vs Naples Grande - GardnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Karen Hole vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Tracy Wing0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulianne Lassus / Jennifer Sherman vs Wendy Garber / Kristie McCormick3-6, 3-6
2022-02-09vs World Tennis Club - BadiuLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Hole / Jennifer Sherman vs Carole Flegel / Terry Dirr1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Benita Brown vs Michele Nelson-Baker / Jocelyn Badiu2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulianne Lassus / Dawn Becker vs Diane Cahill / Maureen Wells5-7, 4-6
2022-02-01vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Hole / Jennifer Sherman vs Marianne Khayat / Julie Walter6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-01-18vs Pelican Marsh - BargerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Hole / Jennifer Sherman vs Carla Klumpp / Kristine Laterra6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Julianne Lassus vs Marie Shoaf / Julie Mans6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-01-11vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Hole / Karen Tumulty vs Catherine Rigamer / Kimberly Davey4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulianne Lassus / Jennifer Sherman vs Mia Delk / Amy Anzilotti6-1, 6-2
2022-01-04vs Pelican Marsh - NavarroSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Karen Hole vs Shelley Boggess / Kristen Catino7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBenita Brown / Rachael Kaplan vs Kelley Lindes / Lori Caple4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Stacy Katsiyiannis
published
3.86
Eileen Valerio
published 4
3.80
Amanda Mallette
published 4
3.77
Heather Christie
published 4
3.62
Karen Hole
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.62
Kelly Stein
published
3.58
Mariya Rebreeva
published
3.29
Benita Brown
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Julianne Lassus
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.27
Nancy Nichols
published
3.19
Karen Tumulty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Jennifer Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Mallette + Eileen Valerio7066% games+7.3% vs expected
Karen Hole + Karen Tumulty51042% games+3.5% vs expected
Benita Brown + Karen Tumulty81043% games−2.6% vs expected
Eileen Valerio + Kelly Stein5250% games−6.3% vs expected
Jennifer Sherman + Karen Hole5743% games−18.6% vs expected
Julianne Lassus + Benita Brown2350% gamesnot enough data
Julianne Lassus + Karen Tumulty134 matchesnot enough data
Heather Christie + Karen Hole033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Katsiyiannis
65W–42L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Eileen Valerio
16W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Amanda Mallette
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Heather Christie
67W–72L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Karen Hole
99W–147L career · 10 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Kelly Stein
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Mariya Rebreeva
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Benita Brown
25W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Julianne Lassus
85W–70L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Nancy Nichols
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Karen Tumulty
56W–84L career · 9 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jennifer Sherman
18W–19L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.