Teams

SChandra (Charlotte Indoor Tennis Club)

2022 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-08vs CDewaele (Springfield)Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Erin Overcash6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMayela Magur vs Jocelyne Robinson6-3, 6-1
2022-08-02vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 30
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Siobhan Papa6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMayela Magur vs Grace Snyder6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMelodie Ohaus vs Lauren Culp6-2, 6-4
2022-07-12vs NBadr/DMaguire (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Kristen Agee2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMayela Magur vs Stefanie Cage3-6, 4-6
2022-06-28vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Cori Niemann7-5, 7-5
2022-06-21vs CDewaele (Springfield)Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Erin Overcash6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMayela Magur vs Elizabeth Smith7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-07vs NBadr/DMaguire (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs Stefanie Cage6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMayela Magur vs Kristen Agee2-6, 0-6
2022-05-31Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmber Nee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMelodie Ohaus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Amber Nee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
3.08
Mayela Magur
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Melodie Ohaus
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.78
Shruti Chandra
published
2.75
Dawn Houpt
published 3
2.52
Lauren Baynham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melodie Ohaus + Shruti Chandra3345% games−1.1% vs expected
Mayela Magur + Shruti Chandra404 matchesnot enough data
Melodie Ohaus + Mayela Magur213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Baynham + Shruti Chandra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Nee
108W–41L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Courtney Reichs Mixon
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Mayela Magur
133W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Shruti Chandra
26W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Dawn Houpt
32W–26L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Lauren Baynham
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.