Teams

YMCA:Brunet:Jamback

2024 NH Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 1

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-09vs EXE:Law:KarrLost 12
W#1 DoublesRobert Koziol / Teresa Colena vs Aurelian Diaconu / Vivien Law2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarsha Baray / Dan Gagnon vs Liviu Ispas / Lori Collins2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Jamback / Robert Jamback vs Tracy Healey / Matt Healey4-6, 6-7
2024-06-02vs MTS:Spin&Slice:NippeLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicholas Brunet / Abigail Rogers vs Kate Dunlop / Daniel Scharpf0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDan Gagnon / Jaynemarie Wright vs Jayson Burak / Donna Anzalone3-6, 3-6
2024-05-19vs EXE:Gamache:StarWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeresa Colena / Rajesh Manoharan vs Tracey Gamache / Ryan Gamache1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAbigail Rogers / Robert Koziol vs Nicole Doherty / Hugo Gonzalez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarsha Baray / Dan Gagnon vs Jessica Houseman / Christopher Cormier6-1, 6-4
2024-05-05vs MTS:Spin&Slice:NippeLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Colena / Thomas Muttitt vs Stuart Scott / Gretchen Fougere1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Jamback / Robert Jamback vs Laurie Stadler / Jason Stadler3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJaynemarie Wright / Nicholas Brunet vs Donna Anzalone / Jayson Burak2-6, 2-6
2024-04-28vs EXE:Law:KarrLost 12
L#1 DoublesAbigail Rogers / Rajesh Manoharan vs Kelly Karr / Denis Vaillancourt3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobyn Brunet / Nicholas Brunet vs Carmen du Plessis / Gary du Plessis0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Brent / Diane Taft vs Lori Collins / Liviu Ispas4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-14vs YMCA:Pagliuca:SmykilWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobyn Brunet / Nicholas Brunet vs David Norton / Jane Goodman6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRajesh Manoharan / Marsha Baray vs Jeanne Mellish / Todd Mellish5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Brent / Diane Taft vs Mike Pagliuca / Helen Dugan6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTS:Spin&Slice:Nippe0612613112
2EXE:Law:Karr0611715130
3EXE:Gamache:Star0611717139
4YMCA:Brunet:Jamback0671126186
5YMCA:Pagliuca:Smykil0641429192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Rajesh Manoharan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Teresa Colena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Abigail Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Dan Gagnon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Nicholas Brunet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Thomas Muttitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Diane Taft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Jaynemarie Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Susan Jamback
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Robyn Brunet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Marsha Baray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
James Brent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul R Beauchesne
published
Robert Jamback
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Koziol
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Brunet + Nicholas Brunet11139% games−2.3% vs expected
James Brent + Diane Taft8744% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Muttitt + Teresa Colena0534% gamesnot enough data
Dan Gagnon + Abigail Rogers044 matchesnot enough data
Susan Jamback + Robert Jamback033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rajesh Manoharan
48W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Teresa Colena
104W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Abigail Rogers
64W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Dan Gagnon
10W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Nicholas Brunet
11W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Thomas Muttitt
24W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Diane Taft
35W–65L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
Jaynemarie Wright
23W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Susan Jamback
35W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
Robyn Brunet
37W–98L career · 2 lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.38
Marsha Baray
25W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.34
James Brent
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul R Beauchesne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Jamback
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Koziol
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.