Teams

ABauer

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 2.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01vs JWolborsky Tri LevelLost 01
L#3 DoublesJade Paunovich / Gina Marlowe vs Suzy Blackwell / Michele Nowicki2-6, 4-6
2022-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Jo Nugent / Jennifer Viscosi vs LUCY LAV / Tracey Carlin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-18vs CByrumWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Bauer / Jennifer Viscosi vs Christine Panzl / Sarah Schmalz6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Rayda / Gina Marlowe vs Susan Gentry / Ann Mailly6-3, 6-1
2022-07-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesDawn Rusnak / Amy Cagle vs Rondi Furgason / Tracy Dickerson6-2, 6-4
2022-06-27vs JWolborsky Tri LevelLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Jo Nugent / Jennifer Viscosi vs Heather Bilderback / Evelyn Andino7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-13vs CByrumSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Viscosi / Pamela Pitre vs Christine Panzl / Erica Rankin2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Rusnak / Jade Paunovich vs Ann Mailly / Anne Jones6-2, 6-2
2022-06-06vs NNorrisLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Cagle / Diane Maginnis vs Rondi Furgason / Brittany Shumaker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-03vs TKozacko-Bccc/TriWon 10
W#3 DoublesDawn Rusnak / Karen Rayda vs Heather Rigney / MacKenzie DeVane6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Katherine Canavan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.44
Samantha Starr
published
3.42
Mary Jo Nugent
published
3.27
Amanda Bauer
published 3.5
2.99
Amy Cagle
published 3
2.87
Julie Shuey
published
2.84
Jennifer Viscosi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Molly Clark
published
2.71
Jade Paunovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Pamela Pitre
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.57
Kelly Huffstetler
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.54
Dawn Rusnak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.27
Diane Maginnis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Gina Marlowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Shuey + Jade Paunovich1740% games−3.6% vs expected
Dawn Rusnak + Jade Paunovich6549% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Pitre + Jade Paunovich3444% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Huffstetler + Jennifer Viscosi2443% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Pitre + Kelly Huffstetler0529% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Huffstetler + Jade Paunovich0534% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Huffstetler + Katherine Canavan3251% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Pitre + Dawn Rusnak044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Canavan
180W–118L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Samantha Starr
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
Mary Jo Nugent
42W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amanda Bauer
13W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Amy Cagle
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
Julie Shuey
11W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Jennifer Viscosi
75W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Molly Clark
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Jade Paunovich
85W–180L career · 9 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Pamela Pitre
47W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Kelly Huffstetler
84W–118L career · 7 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Dawn Rusnak
134W–126L career · 3 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Diane Maginnis
20W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Gina Marlowe
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.