Teams

Sports Mall-Adams/Heiden

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

20 players · average NTRP 3.96 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-02vs Antczak Park-DayWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Renfro / Michelle Edwards vs Janice Stokes-Burns / Elaine Zuckerman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-29vs Liberty Park-TieffLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Koelliker / Lindie Hoggan vs Kalee King / Krysia Leason6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs Antczak Park-DayWon 20
W#2 DoublesLindie Hoggan / Kristel Affleck vs Claire McNulty / Lynette Wills7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNicole Reese / Michelle Edwards vs Karen Nickolaisen / Yoko Walljasper5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLindie Hoggan / Kristy Olsen vs Megan Alexander / Wendy Engel2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Amber Jorgensen
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.92
Alyson Ellis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.81
Crystel Fox
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
Teisa Linscott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Susan Koelliker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Anji DowDell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Katy Alder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Joanna Heiden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Annalyn Adams
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.46
Amanda Lewis
published 4
3.38
Lindie Hoggan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Michelle Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Nicole Reese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Kristy Olsen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.15
Tiffany Renfro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.12
Kristel Affleck
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Katie Zimmerman
published
Kriss Young
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Traci Church
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kasteler + Annalyn Adams5069% games+19.1% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Kristel Affleck8461% games+8.7% vs expected
Joanna Heiden + Anji DowDell5458% games+8.1% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Susan Koelliker321059% games+7.2% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Alyson Ellis10458% games+7.0% vs expected
Tiffany Renfro + Michelle Edwards4649% games+6.7% vs expected
Lindie Hoggan + Anji DowDell4356% games+5.4% vs expected
Anji DowDell + Alyson Ellis8363% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amber Jorgensen
34W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4
Alyson Ellis
179W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Tiffany Kasteler
167W–101L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Crystel Fox
151W–134L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Teisa Linscott
170W–105L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Anji DowDell
99W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Katy Alder
81W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Joanna Heiden
93W–99L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Annalyn Adams
122W–97L career · 11 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Amanda Lewis
48W–31L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Lindie Hoggan
57W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Michelle Edwards
94W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Nicole Reese
102W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Kristy Olsen
72W–64L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Tiffany Renfro
119W–133L career · 8 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–115L career · 10 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Katie Zimmerman
27W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kriss Young
37W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Traci Church
39W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.