Teams

PTCTC - Castellow/Stoots

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Castellow / Brenda van Den Enden vs Kimberly Boone / Nancy Jones1-5
2025-03-19Won 20
W#2 DoublesShannon Castellow / Brenda van Den Enden vs Carrie Ann Johanson / Juliet Skonberg6-3, 1-6, 6-3
W#4 DoublesKimberly Niedzwiecki / Pauline Kim vs Kerri Edwards / Tamara LeClair6-0, 1-6, 6-4
2025-03-12Split 11
W#2 DoublesAndrea Feygin / Amanda Page vs Ina Christensen / Sandi Trebuchon6-4, 4-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoyce Link / Elizabeth Doster vs Elizabeth Slattery / Maria Stimpson2-6, 2-6
2024-12-04Split 11
W#3 DoublesShannon Castellow / Andrea Feygin vs Maria Stimpson / Wendy Mason6-1, 6-2
L#4 DoublesKimberly Mulkey / Kimberly Niedzwiecki vs Abby Gates / Cynthia Robbins6-1, 3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for '25 - USTA Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Erin Stoots
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Janna Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Andrea Feygin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.51
Yan QIU
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Pauline Kim
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Shannon Castellow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Karina Morales
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Kimberly Mulkey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Brenda van Den Enden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Joyce Link
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Beth Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Alicia Steele
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Doster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Amanda Page
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.66
Kimberly Niedzwiecki
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Castellow + Brenda van Den Enden5447% games−4.5% vs expected
Andrea Feygin + Brenda van Den Enden3347% games−14.3% vs expected
Shannon Castellow + Andrea Feygin5161% gamesnot enough data
Karina Morales + Yan QIU4167% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Link + Yan QIU314 matchesnot enough data
Janna Campbell + Beth Ellis134 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Link + Andrea Feygin213 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Link + Kimberly Mulkey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Stoots
28W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
Janna Campbell
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Andrea Feygin
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Yan QIU
32W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Pauline Kim
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Shannon Castellow
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Karina Morales
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
Kimberly Mulkey
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brenda van Den Enden
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Joyce Link
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Beth Ellis
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alicia Steele
9W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Elizabeth Doster
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Amanda Page
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Kimberly Niedzwiecki
10W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.