Teams

2022 Tri Level Womens 40- Rita Garcia

2022 Tri Level 40 & Over · 2022 Tri Level Womens 40

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesJanet Burgos / Wilma Colon vs Milandra Ramirez de Arellano / Anelis Torres6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRosa Montanez / Sonia Negron vs Marie Negron / Wildalie Lopez6-1, 7-5
2022-12-08vs 2022 Tri Level Womens 40- DulceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVanessa Mulero / Wilma Colon vs Jenniffer Rodriguez-Rivera / Erohani Torres6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMagdalis Costa / Janet Burgos vs Angela Rosado / Sylvia Reyes6-4, 7-6
2022-12-04vs 2022 Tri Level Womens 40- DoriluzLost 02
L#2 DoublesJanet Burgos / Wilma Colon vs Damaris Diaz / Lizbeth Febles Centeno4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesIris Rebecca Gobaira / Sonia Negron vs Evelyn Cintron / Doriluz Amador3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Burgos / Magdalis Costa vs Laura Montes de Oca / Karla Letona5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRosa Montanez / Sonia Negron vs Elaine Isaac / Emma M Cestero6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesWilma Colon / Vanessa Mulero vs Wilma Leon Guzman / Yadir Diaz Narvaez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMagdalis Costa / Wanda Archilla vs Brenda Rivera / Maria Grafals5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Tri Level Womens 40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Vanessa Mulero
published
3.23
Lillian Nieves
published
3.20
Wilma Colon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Maria Rivera
published
3.01
Janet Burgos
published
3.00
Magdalis Costa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Sonia Negron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Wanda Archilla
published
2.89
Aida Baerga
published 3
2.62
Lourdes Figueras
published
Rosa Montanez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wilma Colon + Janet Burgos8251% games−2.3% vs expected
Magdalis Costa + Sonia Negron224 matchesnot enough data
Aida Baerga + Sonia Negron224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vanessa Mulero
35W–33L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Lillian Nieves
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Wilma Colon
105W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Maria Rivera
43W–17L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Janet Burgos
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Magdalis Costa
92W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
3.5
Sonia Negron
91W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
Wanda Archilla
39W–55L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Aida Baerga
24W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Iris Rebecca Gobaira
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Lourdes Figueras
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosa Montanez
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.