Teams

Kiwi - Carlson

2025 Brevard Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-15vs Rockledge - TullochLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Carlson / Patrick Carlson vs Jim Tulloch / Linda Carrillo1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Redmon / Anne Burns vs Richard Carrillo / Mary Failla1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTj Persicketti / Angila Burke vs Meredith Christie / Todd Christie3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-07vs EFSC - BelcherWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatrick Carlson / Danielle Carlson vs Harley Lego / Joshua Udvardy2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Richards / Kelsey Richards vs DeAnn Barksdale / Andrew Belcher6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Burns / Mark Redmon vs Susan Ford / Bill Stanley6-1, 6-1
2025-06-09vs EFSC - BelcherWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Carlson / Patrick Carlson vs Bill Stanley / Harley Lego6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Burns / Tj Persicketti vs DeAnn Barksdale / Andrew Belcher4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngila Burke / Eric Burke vs John Bailey / Jennifer Bailey6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Daniel Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Patrick Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Julianne Moore
published
2.88
Tj Persicketti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Angila Burke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Mark Redmon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Eric Burke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Melissa Yanko
published
2.49
Danielle Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.32
Lisa Sexton
published
2.18
Anne Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kelsey Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Carlson + Patrick Carlson4453% games+7.6% vs expected
Anne Burns + Tj Persicketti314 matchesnot enough data
Angila Burke + Eric Burke224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniel Richards
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Patrick Carlson
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Julianne Moore
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Tj Persicketti
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Angila Burke
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Mark Redmon
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Eric Burke
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Melissa Yanko
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Danielle Carlson
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Lisa Sexton
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Anne Burns
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Kelsey Richards
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.