← Teams

Tonks/YMCA/Foothills

2022 Foothills Spring 40 & Over League · Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-14vs Gould/DV/FoothilsWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Ellen Stupka vs Robin Smith / Amanda Berry6-2, 6-3
2022-04-07vs Walker/HCP/FoothillsLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Weena Gonzalez vs Tammy Dennis / Kristina Abee4-6, 2-6
2022-03-31vs Morin/LHCC/FoothillsLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Charlotte Hartman vs Saundra Denny / Candace Scott3-6, 1-6
2022-03-17vs Walker/HCP/FoothillsLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Dawn Owens vs Tammy Dennis / Kristina Abee0-6, 1-6
2022-03-03vs Gould/DV/FoothilsLost 0–1
L#1 SinglesKaren Tonks vs Carol Almond4-6, 5-7
2022-02-24vs Walker/HCP/FoothillsWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Dawn Owens vs Betty Mahoney / Kelly Walker6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Karen Tonks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Ellen Stupka
published 4
3.66
3.56
Kelli Schmidt
published —
3.43
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.37
Megan Reid
published —
3.29
Elise Wright
published 3.5
3.24
Margie Henry
published —
3.16
Christina Long
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Stupka + Karen Tonks4–452% games−5.3% vs expected
Megan Reid + Elise Wright2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ellen Stupka
73W–37L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
—
Kelli Schmidt
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
—
Megan Reid
25W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Elise Wright
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
—
Margie Henry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Christina Long
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.