Teams

Marple - River Creek

2023 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-17vs Goodwin/ Bixler - AVSPWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarthina Marple / Stephanie Holguin vs Ashley Littman / Melinda McGowan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLoAnne Hanlon vs Briona Desmond3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSara Marlin / Leanne Smith vs Matina Roberts / Amber Wooten6-4, 6-2
2023-07-13vs Fulkerson - Stoneleigh CCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarthina Marple / Sara Marlin vs Carrie Henze / Patricia Yriart6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLoAnne Hanlon vs Maureen Fulkerson1-6, 2-6
2023-07-12vs Blanketship - Creighton FarmsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTia Holt / Sara Marlin vs Jamie Davis / Sara Jane Sherry6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Kelly Rowley1-6, 0-6
2023-07-07vs Fulkerson - Stoneleigh CCLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Melissa Haugh6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-06vs Barnett/ Chestnut - CascadesWon 20
W#1 SinglesLoAnne Hanlon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarthina Marple / Marianne Moore vs Kathleen Barnett / Maryam Aranee3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-27vs Blanketship - Creighton FarmsWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Marlin / Marianne Moore vs Rebecca McDonald / Vanessa Moore6-0, 6-2
2023-06-26vs Goodwin/ Bixler - AVSPLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Sandra Kim7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-12vs Barnett/ Chestnut - CascadesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarthina Marple / Joy Moynihan vs Stefany Glessner / Kristen Kilguss3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLoAnne Hanlon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
LoAnne Hanlon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.97
Tosha Clark
published
2.93
Joy Moynihan
published
2.55
Sandra Moses
published
2.51
Sara Marlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
Leanne Smith
published
2.39
Carthina Marple
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 2.5
2.28
Patti Klein
published
2.18
Stephanie Holguin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Moynihan + Sandra Moses224 matchesnot enough data
Carthina Marple + LoAnne Hanlon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
LoAnne Hanlon
103W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.23
Tosha Clark
54W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Joy Moynihan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Sandra Moses
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Sara Marlin
43W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Leanne Smith
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%66%34%
2.45
2.5
Carthina Marple
50W–87L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%81%19%
2.39
Patti Klein
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.28
Jennifer Volk-Fortier
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Stephanie Holguin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.