Teams

NJ BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs BP GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesValerie Martin / Jeanine Foster vs Erin Heltshe / Emily Adams2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Mara Orchard7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRenee Weidemann / Trina Jones vs Jill Nelson / Karen Brennan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Shugrue / Cynthia Frederick vs JJ Wagner / Kelly Fleck6-0, 6-2
2021-07-13vs MVCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJeanine Foster / Renee Weidemann vs Angela Mays / Madeleine Futterman4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Angela Messinger6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Martin / Mary Shugrue vs Lori Clark / Sarah McMahon6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTrina Jones / Cynthia Frederick vs Debra Steffensen / Debra O'Donnell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-06vs NJ REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeanine Foster / Valerie Martin vs Debbie Lipski / Angela Hale2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Katie Policaro6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Elliott / Lisa Ritchie vs Katie Stelmach / Holly McClure4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrina Jones / Renee Weidemann vs Jackie Greiner / Nina Miranda6-2, 6-4
2021-06-29vs HIW BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesValerie Martin / Renee Weidemann vs Shena Cothran / Laurie Johnson4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Daphne Taber2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Shugrue / Stephanie Elliott vs Lark Stewart / Amy Long1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Ritchie / Cynthia Frederick vs Deirdre Brigham / Teri Kalbfleisch6-2, 6-4
2021-06-22vs NJ PURPLESplit 22
W#1 DoublesLisa Ritchie / Valerie Martin vs Bonita Thistle / Debbee Cdebaca6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Elizabeth Jones6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTrina Jones / Stephanie Elliott vs Diane Hedberg / Sarah Weill1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Shugrue / Cynthia Frederick vs Mary Alberts / Patti Warner4-6, 1-6
2021-06-15vs RHCC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesTrina Jones / Valerie Martin vs Brenda Christy / Rachel Kacmar2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDorelle Peters vs Melissa Pugh0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Elliott / Renee Weidemann vs Aimee Petri / Jody Alderman4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Shugrue / Cynthia Frederick vs Carol Tye Rose / Elizabeth Grevengoed2-6, 1-6
2021-06-08vs LPTC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesTrina Jones / Stephanie Elliott vs Kathleen Rimlinger / Spring Merino4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJeanine Foster vs Rebecca Glatz7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMary Shugrue / Lisa Ritchie vs Laurie Lahnert / Lesleigh Anderson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRenee Weidemann / Cynthia Frederick vs Meegan Miloud / Kay Newman6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Mary Shugrue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Valerie Martin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.62
Dorelle Peters
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.28
Cynthia Frederick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jeanine Foster
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Lisa Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Renee Weidemann
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanine Foster + Stephanie Elliott2450% games+3.8% vs expected
Lisa Ritchie + Valerie Martin4449% games+3.0% vs expected
Stephanie Elliott + Valerie Martin4451% games−0.1% vs expected
Lisa Ritchie + Stephanie Elliott3448% games−0.7% vs expected
Jeanine Foster + Valerie Martin1739% games−6.2% vs expected
Mary Shugrue + Cynthia Frederick1642% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Frederick + Valerie Martin1443% gamesnot enough data
Jeanine Foster + Lisa Ritchie404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Shugrue
127W–93L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
Valerie Martin
37W–68L career · 6 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Dorelle Peters
35W–42L career · 6 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Cynthia Frederick
30W–50L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%96%4%
2.28
Jeanine Foster
25W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Ritchie
35W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Renee Weidemann
12W–10L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Elliott
16W–29L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.