Teams

HCC - Armagost

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-19Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMiguel Angel Goni Rodrigo / Mark Wolfson vs Barry Cohen / Donald Bell4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Jeffrey Biezunski vs Jaime Villegas / Alvin MacAsinag3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesBryant Moore / David Voelker vs Davis Bilardello / Alan Freedman6-2, 6-3
2022-02-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Armagost / Thor Moody vs Carrington Lobban / Bob Murdock3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-02-19Won 20
W#2 DoublesBrad Armagost / Thor Moody vs Michael Leeds / Brian Sheehan6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBryant Moore / David Voelker vs Freddy Russian / Ross Feldman6-4, 6-1
2022-01-15vs Arbor Greene Smash City - WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesThor Moody / Stephen Mullis vs Jose Alomar / Jakob Andersen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Sarkozy / David Voelker vs Paul Williams / Tom Layton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-08vs Saddlebrook - BarbettaLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Wolfson / Brian Sarkozy vs Albert Alhadeff / Richard Helme3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hugo Rodriguez
published 4.5
3.96
Etienne Aduya
published 4
3.84
Brian Sarkozy
published 4
Brad Armagost
published 4
Frank Berdos
published 4
3.72
Thor Moody
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Bryant Moore
published 4
3.65
David Voelker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Mark Wolfson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Randy Sterns
published
Stephen Mullis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Wolfson + Thor Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hugo Rodriguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Etienne Aduya
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Brian Sarkozy
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Frank Berdos
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thor Moody
148W–97L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Bryant Moore
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Mark Wolfson
62W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Sterns
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Mullis
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.