Teams

SBTC-Lemon Drops

2023 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Women Doubles - 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-03vs KTC-KnockoutsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Jakobson / Galen Wilson vs Rachael Stein / Kristin Mcwilliams6-3, 6-1
2023-11-05vs Muni-Peace, Love & TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Jakobson / Linda Stirling vs Tracy Selbie / Julia Cushing0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-22vs Elings-Les RacquettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Jakobson / Karen Guardino vs Marian Smith-McBroom / Andrea Borgatello Forry3-6, 6-7
2023-09-10vs Elings-Les RacquettesLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Jakobson / Anne Mitchell vs Marian Smith-McBroom / Lori Travis4-6, 2-6
2023-04-30vs Pershing-Sets on the BeachLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrenda Dentinger vs Kio Novina2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Stirling / Lisa Reich vs Katherine Steele / Jennifer Freeman2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKathryn Hinsch / Kristina Holdren vs Jaime Dejong / Leslie Schneiderman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Caryn Garrett
published 3.5
3.45
Galen Wilson
published
3.31
Anne Mitchell
published 3.5
3.30
Serena Weddle
published
Carol Tricase
published 3.5
3.21
Amy Jakobson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Stephanie June
published
3.16
Kristina Holdren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Karen Guardino
published 3.5
3.07
Laurie Wilson
published
3.06
Stephanie Ornani
published
2.89
Shirley Sanematsu
published
2.87
Susan Dunton
published
2.85
Brenda Dentinger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Linda Stirling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Jelks
published
Kathryn Hinsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Marvin
published
Tracey Peterson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Serena Weddle + Galen Wilson8361% games+6.8% vs expected
Caryn Garrett + Tracey Peterson5263% games+2.7% vs expected
Kristina Holdren + Caryn Garrett3251% games−5.9% vs expected
Kristina Holdren + Serena Weddle1840% games−12.3% vs expected
Caryn Garrett + Anne Mitchell3249% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Wilson + Linda Stirling134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Auchincloss-Del Bonis + Stephanie Ornani224 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Holdren + Galen Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caryn Garrett
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Galen Wilson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
3.5
Anne Mitchell
33W–31L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Serena Weddle
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Carol Tricase
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Amy Jakobson
42W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Stephanie June
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Kristina Holdren
18W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Karen Guardino
11W–29L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Laurie Wilson
10W–23L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Stephanie Ornani
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Mary Auchincloss-Del Bonis
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
Shirley Sanematsu
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Susan Dunton
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Brenda Dentinger
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Linda Stirling
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.73
Barbara Jelks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Hinsch
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Marvin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracey Peterson
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.