Teams

LA - Last Changeover

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Men 4.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-17vs LA LLW Good Friends - Stephen KimLost 23
L#1 DoublesE Lars Mellis / Rodney Ferrell vs Jason Nam / Jimmy Lee1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJuan Pereira vs Alan Han0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesClement Chan / Chris Bedford vs Dastan Mazhetayev / Rand Lee6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTuan Ngo vs George Rodriguez6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRay Cherry / Darv Nichole Dayondon vs SEUNG KIM / Tariq Arif6-7, 2-6
2025-05-03vs LA - Sets on FireWon 41
W#1 DoublesRay Cherry / Juan Pereira vs Stephen Nimick / Bryan Yang6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAdam Sapper vs Jason Jin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDouglas Shin / Philip Luu vs Daniel Eisenberg / Joe Halbardier4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTatsuya Ogawa vs Daniel Shao6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJasper Juaniza / Loc Nguyen vs Shaan Arora / Tyson Su4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Adam Sapper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.83
Joseph Mihal
published
3.83
Tatsuya Ogawa
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.80
Chris Bedford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Kenneth Huang
published
3.78
Juan Pereira
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
E Lars Mellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Frank Reback
published 4
3.70
Philip Luu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Clement Chan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Tuan Ngo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Ding Kong
published 4
3.62
Douglas Shin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Patrick Loo
published
3.58
Rodney Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Dustin Louie
published 4
3.46
Jose Verdida
published
3.42
Darv Nichole Dayondon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Kelly McMillen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.36
Matthew Boehm
published
Everjohn Feliciano
published 3.5
Jasper Juaniza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ray Cherry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Boehm + Kenneth Huang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Sapper
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Joseph Mihal
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Tatsuya Ogawa
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Chris Bedford
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
Kenneth Huang
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.80
Juan Pereira
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
E Lars Mellis
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Frank Reback
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Philip Luu
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Clement Chan
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Tuan Ngo
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Ding Kong
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Douglas Shin
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
Patrick Loo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Rodney Ferrell
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Dustin Louie
4W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jose Verdida
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Darv Nichole Dayondon
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Kelly McMillen
84W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Matthew Boehm
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Everjohn Feliciano
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jasper Juaniza
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ray Cherry
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.