Teams

Jones 4.0 Mixed

2026 Mixed 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 · 4.0 Adult 40 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-16vs SH - OakleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdwin Garner Jr / Donna Garner vs David Bachofer / Cynthia Fennel1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSandra Kirk / Ronny Jones vs Chad Oakley / Valerie Oakley2-6, 2-6
2026-07-12vs SH - OakleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdwin Garner Jr / Donna Garner vs Valerie Oakley / Chad Oakley3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTamela Traglia / Ronny Jones vs Sharon Garrison / Kevin Strickland1-6, 3-6
2026-07-09vs SH - OakleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesEugene Schrock / Sandra Kirk vs David Bachofer / Sharon Garrison0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAubrey Miree / Melissa Young vs Caitlin Barker / Neal Barker2-6, 5-7
2026-06-29vs SH - OakleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesTamela Traglia / Eugene Schrock vs Claire Mitchell / David Bachofer7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAubrey Miree / Melissa Young vs Cynthia Fennel / Kevin Strickland6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-18vs SH - OakleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesTamela Traglia / Aubrey Miree vs Chad Oakley / Cynthia Fennel3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEdwin Garner Jr / Donna Garner vs David Bachofer / Claire Mitchell7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRonny Jones / Sandra Kirk vs Neal Barker / Caitlin Barker0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Adult 40 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SH - Oakley50150363
2Jones 4.0 Mixed0501530182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Eugene Schrock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Tamela Traglia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Aubrey Miree
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Sandra Kirk
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Edwin Garner Jr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Ronny Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Donna Garner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Garner + Edwin Garner Jr0632% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eugene Schrock
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
Tamela Traglia
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Aubrey Miree
0W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Sandra Kirk
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Edwin Garner Jr
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Ronny Jones
0W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Donna Garner
8W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.