← Teams

DSwann

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-12vs SLav 7.5 40+Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesRay Goldberg / Vincent Conzola vs Scott Arra / Christopher Bricker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKen Nowell / Ajaz Sadiq vs Philip Gugliotta / Jeff Abercrombie6-1, 6-0
2022-10-05vs Markham 7.5 ComboLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesGreg Kasse / Vincent Conzola vs Joe Neylan / Paul Holscher4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKen Nowell / Kevin Breemes vs Mike Hennen / John Vander Vennet6-7, 6-7
2022-09-28vs BMooneyWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesKevin Breemes / Ken Nowell vs Howard Critcher / Jason Tuttle2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGreg Kasse / Vincent Conzola vs Ben Barwick / William Mooney6-3, 6-1
2022-09-20vs SLav 7.5 40+Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRay Goldberg / Vincent Conzola vs Jeffrey Monaghen / Philip Gugliotta3-6, 0-6
2022-09-14vs JGouveia 7.5 40+Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesHai Le / Vincent Conzola vs David McNeill / Chris Henrion6-4, 7-6
2022-08-31vs Markham 7.5 ComboWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesKen Nowell / Kevin Breemes vs Penn Holderness / John Vander Vennet6-3, 6-4
2022-08-24vs BMooneyLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKevin Breemes / Ken Nowell vs Lawrence Brock / David Hill3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVincent Conzola / Tony Richardson vs Rodney Lohman / Blake Paro3-6, 3-6
2022-08-10vs JGouveia 7.5 40+Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKen Nowell / Vincent Conzola vs Mark Zimmerman / Frank Allison6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ken Nowell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Hai Le
published 4
3.54
Ray Goldberg
published —
3.40
David Swann
published 3.5
3.38
Vincent Conzola
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.38
James Worley
published 3.5
3.09
ROEHL SANTOS
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vincent Conzola + Ken Nowell18–759% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ken Nowell
211W–147L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Hai Le
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
—
Ray Goldberg
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
David Swann
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Vincent Conzola
205W–133L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
James Worley
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
—
ROEHL SANTOS
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.