Teams

300 Neelands

2025 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.14 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-29vs Alachua/Van Roy/40&Over9.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesJosh Spink / Tanja Magoc vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Vincent LoCascio0-3
W#2 DoublesAnita Rajasekhar / Robert Taylor vs Ekanong van Roy / Douglas Dace6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJenny Neelands / Alejandro Pauly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-15vs Alachua/Van Roy/40&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesCamilo Fita / Dawn Dean vs Peter Kim / Tracey Bryant1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJosh Spink / Anita Rajasekhar vs Donny Reeder / Lan Hoang-Minh1-6, 0-6
2025-04-27vs Alachua/Van Roy/40&Over9.0MSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJenny Neelands / Alejandro Pauly vs MEGAN MOLYNEUX / Douglas Dace3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCamilo Fita / Dawn Dean vs Kelly Banes / Vincent LoCascio1-6, 1-6
2025-04-22vs Alachua/Van Roy/40&Over9.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeather Gibson / Josh Spink vs Ekanong van Roy / Vincent LoCascio1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Pauly / Anita Rajasekhar vs Tracey Bryant / Peter Kim2-6, 4-6
2025-04-13vs Alachua/Van Roy/40&Over9.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Dean / David Blumberg vs Donny Reeder / Lan Hoang-Minh3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Pauly / Jenny Neelands vs Vincent LoCascio / Cortney Wright6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCamilo Fita / Lynn Godwin vs Kelly Banes / Douglas Dace2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Alejandro Pauly
published 4.5
David Blumberg
published 4.5
3.85
Jenny Neelands
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Anita Rajasekhar
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.73
Josh Spink
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.65
Dawn Dean
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Lynn Godwin
published
3.53
Camilo Fita
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.31
Heather Gibson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Spink + Jenny Neelands4652% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alejandro Pauly
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
David Blumberg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jenny Neelands
243W–94L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Anita Rajasekhar
130W–74L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Josh Spink
186W–129L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Dawn Dean
44W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
Lynn Godwin
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Camilo Fita
132W–77L career · 10 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.53
Heather Gibson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.