Teams

State College - Claus

Northern Tier - 18 & Over Adults · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-20vs State College - DuffieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlex Lubin / Logan Hutton vs PETER ILIEV / Daniel Park6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSamuel Kibler vs Marcos Lissauer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-18vs State College - DuffieWon 21
W#1 SinglesHayden Chisholm vs Robert Stahley6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMook Bangalore / Philip Cesani vs Luke Marrinan / Kevin Fiorenzo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNicholas Governatori vs Jean Mongeau3-6, 6-6
2025-07-12vs Williampsort - Greenway / YoungWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlex Lubin / Tarkeshwar Singh vs Kent Young / Brian Klinefelter6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEric Claus vs Brenan Haines6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSamuel Kibler vs Jack Weaver6-2
2025-07-10vs State College - DuffieWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Claus / Alex Lubin vs Alex Beck / Vince Liu6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrian Rowan vs Luke Marrinan6-0, 6-0
2025-07-05vs Williampsort - Greenway / YoungWon 30
W#1 DoublesCraig Newschaffer / Blake Gall vs Kent Young / John Heitsenrether6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEric Claus vs Brenan Haines6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesNicholas Governatori vs Brian Klinefelter6-1, 6-0
2025-06-28vs Williampsort - Greenway / YoungLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrian Rowan / Blake Gall vs Brenan Haines / Ryan Baxter1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesEric Claus vs Jack Weaver2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPhilip Cesani / Tarkeshwar Singh vs Robert McCormack / Michael LeBlanc4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAlex Lubin vs Brian Klinefelter7-5, 6-4
2025-06-21vs State College - DuffieLost 12
W#1 DoublesHayden Chisholm / Eric Claus vs Daniel Park / Chris Snyder6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSamuel Kibler vs Marcos Lissauer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTarkeshwar Singh / John Thompson vs Jean Mongeau / Kevin Fiorenzo3-6, 2-6
2025-06-15vs Williampsort - Greenway / YoungWon 31
W#1 DoublesEric Claus / Hayden Chisholm vs Cody Greenaway / Michael LeBlanc6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSamuel Kibler vs Brenan Haines6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTarkeshwar Singh / Blake Gall vs Kent Young / John Heitsenrether6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJohn Lody vs Brian Klinefelter7-6, 6-1
2025-05-23vs State College - DuffieWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Lubin / Mook Bangalore vs Alexander Deluca / Daniel Park2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHayden Chisholm vs Robert Stahley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Newschaffer / John Thompson vs Luke Marrinan / Geoffrey Field7-6, 6-4
2025-05-18vs Williampsort - Greenway / YoungSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrian Rowan / John Thompson vs Brenan Haines / Ryan Baxter6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlex Lubin vs Jack Weaver4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Newschaffer / Logan Hutton vs Michael LeBlanc / John Heitsenrether7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMook Bangalore vs Brian Klinefelter6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
John Lody
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.88
Eric Claus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.82
Hayden Chisholm
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Samuel Kibler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.63
Nicholas Governatori
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.51
Mook Bangalore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.37
Tarkeshwar Singh
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.29
Craig Newschaffer
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alex Lubin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Brian Rowan
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Blake Gall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Peggy Duffie
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
Philip Cesani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayden Chisholm + Eric Claus303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Lody
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Eric Claus
42W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Hayden Chisholm
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Samuel Kibler
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Nicholas Governatori
23W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Mook Bangalore
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Tarkeshwar Singh
15W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Craig Newschaffer
19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alex Lubin
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brian Rowan
11W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Blake Gall
17W–12L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Peggy Duffie
21W–32L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Philip Cesani
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.